Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

forkful.com

forkful.com

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

355 ms

Resources Loaded

905 ms

Page Rendered

584 ms

forkful.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to forkful.com homepage info - get ready to check Forkful best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about forkful.com

This domain may be for sale!

Visit forkful.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Forkful.com page load time and found that the first response time was 355 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

forkful.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

forkful.com

355 ms

ajax-load-more.css

22 ms

foundation.css

31 ms

css

30 ms

style.css

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Forkful.com, 56% (31 requests) were made to 13699-presscdn-0-78.pagely.netdna-cdn.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (355 ms) belongs to the original domain Forkful.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 826.4 kB (14%)

Content Size

6.1 MB

After Optimization

5.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Forkful.com main page is 6.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 57.8 kB

  • Original 79.1 kB
  • After minification 76.7 kB
  • After compression 21.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.8 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 51.6 kB

  • Original 5.0 MB
  • After minification 5.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Forkful images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 479.3 kB

  • Original 704.8 kB
  • After minification 661.4 kB
  • After compression 225.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 479.3 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 237.7 kB

  • Original 269.4 kB
  • After minification 213.9 kB
  • After compression 31.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Forkful.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 237.7 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (42%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

28

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Forkful. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

forkful.com accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

SEO Factors

forkful.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Forkful.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Forkful.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Forkful. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: