Tools & Wizards About Us
form-filler.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

form-filler.com

The Best Online Form Filler – Web-based Solution For PDF Editing, Fill In, Sign & Print Documents

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

48 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

682 ms

form-filler.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Form Filler content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about form-filler.com

Form filler. Try out the best online form filler. Drag and drop your PDF documents, choose fields needed to be filled, and type your text. Customize font size and kind. Save, print, send or continue e...

Visit form-filler.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Form-filler.com page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

form-filler.com performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

82/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,150 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.2 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

form-filler.com

48 ms

form-filler.com

285 ms

style.css

71 ms

functionality-redesign.css

72 ms

popup-cookie.css

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Form-filler.com, 70% (35 requests) were made to Cdn.mrkhub.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Pdffiller.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (529 ms) relates to the external source Pdffiller.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 157.9 kB (23%)

Content Size

684.4 kB

After Optimization

526.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Form-filler.com main page is 684.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 436.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 58.4 kB

  • Original 73.4 kB
  • After minification 56.2 kB
  • After compression 15.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.3 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 98.8 kB

  • Original 436.5 kB
  • After minification 337.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Form Filler needs image optimization as it can save up to 98.8 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 507 B

  • Original 151.1 kB
  • After minification 151.1 kB
  • After compression 150.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 119 B

  • Original 23.4 kB
  • After minification 23.4 kB
  • After compression 23.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Form-filler.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (52%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Form Filler. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

form-filler.com

form-filler.com

48 ms

form-filler.com

form-filler.com

285 ms

style.css

style.css

71 ms

functionality-redesign.css

functionality-redesign.css

72 ms

popup-cookie.css

popup-cookie.css

75 ms

scroll-up.css

scroll-up.css

76 ms

footer.css

footer.css

77 ms

babel-polyfill.min.js

babel-polyfill.min.js

25 ms

react16-vendors.min.js

react16-vendors.min.js

36 ms

sks_track.js

sks_track.js

92 ms

global.js

global.js

92 ms

functionality-page.js

functionality-page.js

92 ms

popup-cookie.js

popup-cookie.js

90 ms

scrollUp.js

scrollUp.js

162 ms

footer.js

footer.js

107 ms

popup-subscription.js

popup-subscription.js

117 ms

extandPopupOupdatedBrowser.js

extandPopupOupdatedBrowser.js

176 ms

funnel.php

funnel.php

194 ms

user_keyword_store.php

user_keyword_store.php

228 ms

bg.svg

bg.svg

106 ms

combined-shape.svg

combined-shape.svg

109 ms

upload-icon.svg

upload-icon.svg

104 ms

print-icon.svg

print-icon.svg

102 ms

sign-icon.svg

sign-icon.svg

108 ms

review-platform-1.svg

review-platform-1.svg

110 ms

review-platform-2.svg

review-platform-2.svg

155 ms

review-platform-3.svg

review-platform-3.svg

153 ms

review-platform-4.svg

review-platform-4.svg

151 ms

review-platform-5.svg

review-platform-5.svg

152 ms

icon-question.svg

icon-question.svg

150 ms

check-icon.svg

check-icon.svg

157 ms

icon-star-full.svg

icon-star-full.svg

165 ms

icon-star-half.svg

icon-star-half.svg

157 ms

play-icon-white.svg

play-icon-white.svg

166 ms

video-preview-func.png

video-preview-func.png

168 ms

info-icon.svg

info-icon.svg

167 ms

reviews-decoration-desctop.png

reviews-decoration-desctop.png

171 ms

quotes.png

quotes.png

168 ms

footer-accordion-arrow.svg

footer-accordion-arrow.svg

169 ms

close.svg

close.svg

168 ms

icon-cookie-font.png

icon-cookie-font.png

169 ms

logger

logger

205 ms

logger

logger

244 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

263 ms

click

click

203 ms

www.pdffiller.com

www.pdffiller.com

529 ms

landing

landing

30 ms

js

js

78 ms

logger

logger

51 ms

landing

landing

33 ms

Accessibility Review

form-filler.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

form-filler.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

form-filler.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Form-filler.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Form-filler.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

form-filler.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Form Filler. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: