Tools & Wizards About Us
fornetix.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

fornetix.com

Fornetix VaultCore | Encryption Key Management Solutions | Fornetix

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

187 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

fornetix.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Fornetix content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fornetix.com

Advanced encryption key management ecosystem that automates the key lifecycle across the entire enterprise with groundbreaking precision and speed.

Visit fornetix.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fornetix.com page load time and found that the first response time was 187 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fornetix.com performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fornetix.com

187 ms

www.fornetix.com

423 ms

b7983ccdcc4ec6d22c9dd8749fe58546.css

221 ms

reporter.js

210 ms

api.js

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Fornetix.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (733 ms) belongs to the original domain Fornetix.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (36%)

Content Size

6.7 MB

After Optimization

4.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fornetix.com main page is 6.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 155.2 kB

  • Original 183.8 kB
  • After minification 180.6 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 155.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 2.3 MB

  • Original 6.2 MB
  • After minification 4.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fornetix needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.3 MB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 180.4 kB
  • After minification 180.4 kB
  • After compression 179.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 110.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (49%)

Requests Now

89

After Optimization

45

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fornetix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fornetix.com

fornetix.com

187 ms

www.fornetix.com

www.fornetix.com

423 ms

b7983ccdcc4ec6d22c9dd8749fe58546.css

b7983ccdcc4ec6d22c9dd8749fe58546.css

221 ms

reporter.js

reporter.js

210 ms

api.js

api.js

31 ms

sitesearch360-v13.min.js

sitesearch360-v13.min.js

398 ms

avia.js

avia.js

386 ms

shortcodes.js

shortcodes.js

387 ms

audio-player.js

audio-player.js

216 ms

contact.js

contact.js

396 ms

slideshow.js

slideshow.js

395 ms

countdown.js

countdown.js

395 ms

gallery.js

gallery.js

395 ms

gallery_horizontal.js

gallery_horizontal.js

394 ms

headline_rotator.js

headline_rotator.js

461 ms

icongrid.js

icongrid.js

460 ms

iconlist.js

iconlist.js

460 ms

image_hotspots.js

image_hotspots.js

459 ms

magazine.js

magazine.js

460 ms

isotope.js

isotope.js

467 ms

masonry_entries.js

masonry_entries.js

527 ms

menu.js

menu.js

528 ms

notification.js

notification.js

528 ms

numbers.js

numbers.js

529 ms

portfolio.js

portfolio.js

532 ms

progressbar.js

progressbar.js

535 ms

slideshow-video.js

slideshow-video.js

597 ms

slideshow_accordion.js

slideshow_accordion.js

597 ms

slideshow_fullscreen.js

slideshow_fullscreen.js

597 ms

slideshow_layerslider.js

slideshow_layerslider.js

596 ms

tab_section.js

tab_section.js

602 ms

tabs.js

tabs.js

603 ms

testimonials.js

testimonials.js

665 ms

timeline.js

timeline.js

666 ms

toggles.js

toggles.js

666 ms

video.js

video.js

665 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

673 ms

avia-snippet-lightbox.js

avia-snippet-lightbox.js

671 ms

avia-snippet-megamenu.js

avia-snippet-megamenu.js

733 ms

avia-snippet-sticky-header.js

avia-snippet-sticky-header.js

531 ms

avia-snippet-cookieconsent.js

avia-snippet-cookieconsent.js

523 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

184 ms

avia-snippet-widget.js

avia-snippet-widget.js

353 ms

ubermenu.min.js

ubermenu.min.js

358 ms

avia_google_maps_front.js

avia_google_maps_front.js

361 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

411 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

413 ms

entypo-fontello.woff

entypo-fontello.woff

482 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

550 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

21 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

421 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

82 ms

hqdefault.jpg

hqdefault.jpg

53 ms

fornetix-logo-300x30.png

fornetix-logo-300x30.png

77 ms

nav-government.jpg

nav-government.jpg

207 ms

nav-telecom.jpg

nav-telecom.jpg

151 ms

nav-healthcare.jpg

nav-healthcare.jpg

272 ms

nav-finance.jpg

nav-finance.jpg

151 ms

nav-utilities.jpg

nav-utilities.jpg

343 ms

nav-automotive.jpg

nav-automotive.jpg

202 ms

logo-medliminal.png

logo-medliminal.png

209 ms

logo-cantarus.png

logo-cantarus.png

212 ms

bg-identity2.png

bg-identity2.png

483 ms

bg-cloud.jpg

bg-cloud.jpg

413 ms

AdobeStock_222683930.jpeg

AdobeStock_222683930.jpeg

423 ms

gdit-pr-300x180.png

gdit-pr-300x180.png

281 ms

bg-2018-abstract3-bw.jpg

bg-2018-abstract3-bw.jpg

549 ms

icon-cloud-copy.png

icon-cloud-copy.png

349 ms

icon-servers-copy.png

icon-servers-copy.png

412 ms

icon-networking-copy.png

icon-networking-copy.png

418 ms

icon-iot-copy.png

icon-iot-copy.png

481 ms

icon-virtualization-copy.png

icon-virtualization-copy.png

482 ms

icon-hsm-copy.png

icon-hsm-copy.png

487 ms

icon-siem-copy.png

icon-siem-copy.png

493 ms

AdobeStock_278292301.jpeg

AdobeStock_278292301.jpeg

619 ms

AdobeStock_298559232.jpeg

AdobeStock_298559232.jpeg

551 ms

code.jpg

code.jpg

551 ms

utilities-response.jpg

utilities-response.jpg

693 ms

AdobeStock_76892805.jpeg

AdobeStock_76892805.jpeg

564 ms

AdobeStock_171052897.jpeg

AdobeStock_171052897.jpeg

617 ms

AdobeStock_153701640.jpeg

AdobeStock_153701640.jpeg

620 ms

partner-dell.png

partner-dell.png

620 ms

customer-intelligence.png

customer-intelligence.png

635 ms

customer-add-bulgaria.png

customer-add-bulgaria.png

686 ms

customer-amspec.png

customer-amspec.png

686 ms

customer-cantarus.png

customer-cantarus.png

653 ms

customer-medliminal.png

customer-medliminal.png

616 ms

partner-vmware.png

partner-vmware.png

633 ms

partner-wwt.png

partner-wwt.png

663 ms

partner-ncipher.png

partner-ncipher.png

609 ms

partner-cray.png

partner-cray.png

610 ms

partner-carahsoft.png

partner-carahsoft.png

596 ms

partner-racktop.png

partner-racktop.png

561 ms

Accessibility Review

fornetix.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

fornetix.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

fornetix.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fornetix.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fornetix.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fornetix.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fornetix. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: