Tools & Wizards About Us
foslighting.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

foslighting.in

Lighting Manufacturer In India | Buy Fancy Lighting Online India

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

50 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

185 ms

foslighting.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Fos Lighting content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about foslighting.in

Foslighting is a leading lighting manufacturer in India providing antique and fancy home and room lighting solutions. We have a full range of wall lighting, bathroom lighting, ceiling and floor lighti...

Visit foslighting.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Foslighting.in page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

foslighting.in performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,100 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.283

43/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

foslighting.in

50 ms

www.foslighting.in

958 ms

69988476a9edafb6.css

44 ms

15cbae759d1218d5.css

22 ms

1dd3208c-265fdadd103b23aa.js

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Foslighting.in and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Foslighting.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 748.2 kB (11%)

Content Size

6.6 MB

After Optimization

5.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Foslighting.in main page is 6.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 731.3 kB

  • Original 821.9 kB
  • After minification 821.8 kB
  • After compression 90.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 731.3 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 16.9 kB

  • Original 5.8 MB
  • After minification 5.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fos Lighting images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (29%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

59

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fos Lighting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

foslighting.in

foslighting.in

50 ms

www.foslighting.in

www.foslighting.in

958 ms

69988476a9edafb6.css

69988476a9edafb6.css

44 ms

15cbae759d1218d5.css

15cbae759d1218d5.css

22 ms

1dd3208c-265fdadd103b23aa.js

1dd3208c-265fdadd103b23aa.js

33 ms

9997-0a51963de9bc8f98.js

9997-0a51963de9bc8f98.js

31 ms

main-app-9a3ee9c0ce41987d.js

main-app-9a3ee9c0ce41987d.js

23 ms

5c36c3dc-34cd3be3d09995ed.js

5c36c3dc-34cd3be3d09995ed.js

38 ms

a12034ab-57ea22d352833583.js

a12034ab-57ea22d352833583.js

38 ms

7215-ce78378612c8e159.js

7215-ce78378612c8e159.js

49 ms

3040-2eee0845bc316ae2.js

3040-2eee0845bc316ae2.js

47 ms

4289-cc3be30f34c8d4cc.js

4289-cc3be30f34c8d4cc.js

46 ms

5136-1dab95d69d4252cf.js

5136-1dab95d69d4252cf.js

47 ms

1095-5e9c0638c7ca4f77.js

1095-5e9c0638c7ca4f77.js

54 ms

2210-f0049062b4d77134.js

2210-f0049062b4d77134.js

55 ms

5558-8bbf0b285b411fc8.js

5558-8bbf0b285b411fc8.js

60 ms

9766-008c705cac568c65.js

9766-008c705cac568c65.js

58 ms

183-b19e3aed3d6cfb33.js

183-b19e3aed3d6cfb33.js

62 ms

7757-80165ef54507e557.js

7757-80165ef54507e557.js

71 ms

layout-6f8faa4f0f30ff24.js

layout-6f8faa4f0f30ff24.js

73 ms

page-5fbd63d96b2e9192.js

page-5fbd63d96b2e9192.js

72 ms

714-1e98c0adb456d355.js

714-1e98c0adb456d355.js

69 ms

page-3e5a0dec64fd9e4c.js

page-3e5a0dec64fd9e4c.js

74 ms

91a64fe9-dea620453961cf14.js

91a64fe9-dea620453961cf14.js

80 ms

6834-0eb4ba5539bd6cd8.js

6834-0eb4ba5539bd6cd8.js

84 ms

4209-38d7f5ef00dda803.js

4209-38d7f5ef00dda803.js

91 ms

page-cbd50f138694a3df.js

page-cbd50f138694a3df.js

85 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

90 ms

image

image

437 ms

image

image

1317 ms

image

image

448 ms

image

image

449 ms

image

image

463 ms

image

image

749 ms

image

image

1502 ms

image

image

1361 ms

image

image

1557 ms

image

image

1375 ms

image

image

985 ms

image

image

1228 ms

image

image

1471 ms

image

image

1545 ms

image

image

1803 ms

image

image

1616 ms

image

image

2220 ms

image

image

1728 ms

image

image

1779 ms

image

image

2005 ms

image

image

1854 ms

image

image

1954 ms

image

image

2009 ms

image

image

2034 ms

image

image

2088 ms

image

image

2180 ms

image

image

2236 ms

image

image

2241 ms

image

image

2262 ms

image

image

2323 ms

image

image

2403 ms

image

image

2455 ms

image

image

2473 ms

image

image

2470 ms

image

image

2493 ms

webpack-4aebe0b539318ad9.js

webpack-4aebe0b539318ad9.js

2043 ms

image

image

2145 ms

image

image

2185 ms

image

image

2245 ms

image

image

2245 ms

image

image

1966 ms

image

image

1745 ms

image

image

2329 ms

image

image

1542 ms

image

image

1567 ms

image

image

1561 ms

image

image

1474 ms

image

image

1456 ms

image

image

1537 ms

image

image

1602 ms

image

image

1547 ms

image

image

1447 ms

image

image

1405 ms

image

image

1530 ms

image

image

1981 ms

image

image

1439 ms

image

image

1399 ms

Accessibility Review

foslighting.in accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

foslighting.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

foslighting.in SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foslighting.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foslighting.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

foslighting.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fos Lighting. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: