3.8 sec in total
345 ms
3.3 sec
88 ms
Click here to check amazing Fotogpx content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fotogpx.com
fotoGPX te propone una forma fácil y rápida de guardar y recordar tus viajes. Sube el track de tu viaje y las fotos y las verás en el mapa en el lugar donde fueron tomadas. Geolocalización de fotos.
Visit fotogpx.comWe analyzed Fotogpx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 345 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
fotogpx.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value3.6 s
62/100
25%
Value7.8 s
24/100
10%
Value860 ms
33/100
30%
Value0.471
18/100
15%
Value9.2 s
32/100
10%
345 ms
519 ms
114 ms
225 ms
319 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Fotogpx.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Factinet.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Fotogpx.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (33%)
3.4 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Fotogpx.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.0 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 713.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fotogpx needs image optimization as it can save up to 713.8 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 273.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 273.8 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 124.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fotogpx.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 124.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (67%)
76
25
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fotogpx. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fotogpx.com
345 ms
fotogpx.com
519 ms
colorbox.css
114 ms
sexylightbox.css
225 ms
tooltipster.css
319 ms
uniform.default.css
320 ms
buscocio.css
449 ms
jquery.js
562 ms
jquery.autocomplete.pack.js
336 ms
jquery.blockUI.js
476 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
424 ms
inview.js
425 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
450 ms
sexylightbox.v2.3.jquery.js
635 ms
general.js
531 ms
jquery.tooltipster.min.js
561 ms
jquery.uniform.js
574 ms
jquery.noty.js
595 ms
bottom.js
638 ms
bottomRight.js
675 ms
inline.js
674 ms
top.js
673 ms
topCenter.js
714 ms
topLeft.js
741 ms
topRight.js
744 ms
default.js
785 ms
jquery.simplyscroll.css
786 ms
jquerytour.css
786 ms
exceptions.css
833 ms
jquery.simplyscroll.min.js
846 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.6.custom.css
955 ms
tooltipster-smoke.css
897 ms
style.css
1008 ms
script.js
898 ms
style.responsive.css
952 ms
script.responsive.js
952 ms
js_header.php
1026 ms
all.js
23 ms
addthis_widget.js
31 ms
js
66 ms
jquery.ihavecookies.min.js
690 ms
css
45 ms
jquery.ihavecookies.css
689 ms
mini_logo_factinet.gif
141 ms
nav.png
142 ms
facebook-32x32.png
142 ms
twitter-32x32.png
141 ms
googleplus-32x32.png
141 ms
spacer.gif
127 ms
widgets.js
46 ms
all.js
9 ms
cee274f0a7fb859aa81a8d0006efb2dfe5111ecef3.html
121 ms
counter.js
71 ms
t.php
122 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
24 ms
border1.png
122 ms
border2.png
124 ms
loading.gif
123 ms
bgSexy.png
122 ms
buttons.png
119 ms
like.php
480 ms
TweenMax.min.js
212 ms
settings
72 ms
button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js
2 ms
embeds
22 ms
tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.es.html
12 ms
52fed58458ef257flSzSmR7BjfoZRPhqw.png
898 ms
52fed58544314gPgMfospyOTHNbtF06Ng.png
121 ms
52fed585ce49cd22Rocwbn0Gq6P4C8ok6.png
113 ms
52fed5864be48fjIEaMWWciOcR5BHyizi.png
114 ms
52fed5a6e9584v1Tm2k27jdGGylBGLd0L.png
530 ms
52fed5a782636Ln6J9AZv48GUA981N5nY.png
108 ms
52fed5a7e5745rtaYuyOuFSgDx8hUTnvU.png
213 ms
52fed5a886390sKRFEDf9Cp6hOba1Rd9p.png
226 ms
52fed5a9080d0vuH2wL0xHJoOlApmpiVc.png
225 ms
khYakkszxHp.js
88 ms
FEppCFCt76d.png
10 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkM0o58a-xw.ttf
19 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58a-xw.ttf
26 ms
print.css
113 ms
fotogpx.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
fotogpx.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
fotogpx.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fotogpx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fotogpx.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
fotogpx.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fotogpx. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: