Tools & Wizards About Us
fotoservice-vergleich.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 92

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

fotoservice-vergleich.com

Fotoservice im Vergleich - Fotos einfach online entwickeln

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

357 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

211 ms

fotoservice-vergleich.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to fotoservice-vergleich.com homepage info - get ready to check Fotoservice Vergleich best content right away, or after learning these important things about fotoservice-vergleich.com

Fotoservice im Vergleich. Lassen Sie Ihre schönsten Bilder online entwickeln, beim Fotoservice Ihrer Wahl

Visit fotoservice-vergleich.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fotoservice-vergleich.com page load time and found that the first response time was 357 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fotoservice-vergleich.com performance score

92

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

90/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.4 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fotoservice-vergleich.com

357 ms

foto.css

106 ms

preisrechner.js

208 ms

head_foto.jpg

312 ms

fotocom.jpg

106 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Fotoservice-vergleich.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (415 ms) belongs to the original domain Fotoservice-vergleich.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 25.5 kB (24%)

Content Size

105.1 kB

After Optimization

79.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fotoservice-vergleich.com main page is 105.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 81.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 18.3 kB

  • Original 21.5 kB
  • After minification 16.8 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.6 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 81.1 kB
  • After minification 76.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fotoservice Vergleich images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 2.1 kB
  • After compression 343 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fotoservice-vergleich.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fotoservice Vergleich. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

fotoservice-vergleich.com

fotoservice-vergleich.com

357 ms

foto.css

foto.css

106 ms

preisrechner.js

preisrechner.js

208 ms

head_foto.jpg

head_foto.jpg

312 ms

fotocom.jpg

fotocom.jpg

106 ms

zumshop.gif

zumshop.gif

209 ms

5sterne.gif

5sterne.gif

210 ms

pixum.jpg

pixum.jpg

209 ms

photobox.gif

photobox.gif

211 ms

4-5sterne.gif

4-5sterne.gif

210 ms

lidl.jpg

lidl.jpg

310 ms

ifolor.jpg

ifolor.jpg

311 ms

smartphoto.gif

smartphoto.gif

310 ms

gagamoto.gif

gagamoto.gif

314 ms

snapfish.gif

snapfish.gif

313 ms

fotopost24.gif

fotopost24.gif

411 ms

4sterne.gif

4sterne.gif

412 ms

fotokasten.jpg

fotokasten.jpg

413 ms

mypix.jpg

mypix.jpg

413 ms

3-5sterne.gif

3-5sterne.gif

415 ms

Accessibility Review

fotoservice-vergleich.com accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

fotoservice-vergleich.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

fotoservice-vergleich.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fotoservice-vergleich.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Fotoservice-vergleich.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

fotoservice-vergleich.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fotoservice Vergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: