Tools & Wizards About Us
fourcirclemarketing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

fourcirclemarketing.com

Four Circle Marketing - SEO Services | Web Design Company

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

227 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

477 ms

fourcirclemarketing.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to fourcirclemarketing.com homepage info - get ready to check Four Circle Marketing best content right away, or after learning these important things about fourcirclemarketing.com

Four Circle Marketing Company is serving with unlimited and affordable services. We believe in providing solutions for all.

Visit fourcirclemarketing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fourcirclemarketing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 227 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fourcirclemarketing.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value460 ms

62/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.694

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.4 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.fourcirclemarketing.com

227 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

82 ms

style.min.css

236 ms

styles.css

165 ms

style.css

167 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Fourcirclemarketing.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (599 ms) belongs to the original domain Fourcirclemarketing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 113.4 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fourcirclemarketing.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 858.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 40.2 kB

  • Original 50.7 kB
  • After minification 47.3 kB
  • After compression 10.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 35.5 kB

  • Original 858.0 kB
  • After minification 822.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Four Circle Marketing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 22.1 kB

  • Original 367.4 kB
  • After minification 367.4 kB
  • After compression 345.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 15.6 kB

  • Original 72.5 kB
  • After minification 72.3 kB
  • After compression 56.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fourcirclemarketing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.6 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (64%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Four Circle Marketing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.fourcirclemarketing.com

www.fourcirclemarketing.com

227 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

82 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

236 ms

styles.css

styles.css

165 ms

style.css

style.css

167 ms

css

css

23 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

169 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

243 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

168 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

248 ms

style.css

style.css

250 ms

onetone.css

onetone.css

249 ms

onetone-ms.css

onetone-ms.css

250 ms

scheme.less

scheme.less

314 ms

home.css

home.css

321 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

402 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

325 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

326 ms

jquery.nav.js

jquery.nav.js

326 ms

jquery.scrollTo.js

jquery.scrollTo.js

392 ms

api.js

api.js

34 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

400 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

454 ms

index.js

index.js

452 ms

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js

453 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

473 ms

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js

479 ms

respond.min.js

respond.min.js

480 ms

less.min.js

less.min.js

561 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

540 ms

onetone.js

onetone.js

539 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

552 ms

logo.png

logo.png

360 ms

LOGO_.png

LOGO_.png

134 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

376 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

362 ms

mobile-apps.jpg

mobile-apps.jpg

362 ms

mobile-services.jpg

mobile-services.jpg

361 ms

social-marketing.jpg

social-marketing.jpg

360 ms

design.jpg

design.jpg

367 ms

bg-atlanta-1.jpg

bg-atlanta-1.jpg

375 ms

arrow.jpg

arrow.jpg

375 ms

client1.jpg

client1.jpg

362 ms

client2.jpg

client2.jpg

364 ms

client3.jpg

client3.jpg

453 ms

bg-contact.jpg

bg-contact.jpg

599 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

498 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

32 ms

fallback

fallback

24 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

5 ms

css

css

38 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

17 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

18 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

23 ms

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.min.css

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.min.css

84 ms

Accessibility Review

fourcirclemarketing.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

fourcirclemarketing.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

fourcirclemarketing.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fourcirclemarketing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fourcirclemarketing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fourcirclemarketing.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Four Circle Marketing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: