Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

fox-toolkit.org

fox-toolkit.org

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

90 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

2.4 sec

fox-toolkit.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Fox Toolkit content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fox-toolkit.org

Visit fox-toolkit.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Fox-toolkit.org page load time and found that the first response time was 90 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fox-toolkit.org performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.094

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fox-toolkit.org

90 ms

top.html

32 ms

menu.html

66 ms

news.html

241 ms

styles.css

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Fox-toolkit.org, 15% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 15% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (361 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 4.5 kB (13%)

Content Size

34.3 kB

After Optimization

29.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Fox-toolkit.org main page is 34.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 14.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 421 B

  • Original 837 B
  • After minification 827 B
  • After compression 416 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 421 B or 50% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 246 B

  • Original 13.8 kB
  • After minification 13.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fox Toolkit images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 125 B

  • Original 14.6 kB
  • After minification 14.5 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 5.1 kB
  • After minification 4.6 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fox-toolkit.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.7 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (38%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fox Toolkit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

fox-toolkit.org accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

fox-toolkit.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

fox-toolkit.org SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fox-toolkit.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Fox-toolkit.org main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fox Toolkit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: