Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

foxandotter.com

Fox and Otter | Sweet and Spicy Pickles

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

83 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

78 ms

foxandotter.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to foxandotter.com homepage info - get ready to check Fox And Otter best content right away, or after learning these important things about foxandotter.com

Family run business based in Grapevine, TX jarring up Sweet and Spicy pickles for you mouths.

Visit foxandotter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Foxandotter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 83 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

foxandotter.com performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.foxandotter.com

83 ms

minified.js

36 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

34 ms

polyfill.min.js

927 ms

thunderbolt-commons.a79d872a.bundle.min.js

72 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Foxandotter.com, 39% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 32% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (927 ms) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 426.0 kB (45%)

Content Size

938.5 kB

After Optimization

512.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Foxandotter.com main page is 938.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 520.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 409.0 kB

  • Original 520.1 kB
  • After minification 518.4 kB
  • After compression 111.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 409.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 13.4 kB

  • Original 168.1 kB
  • After minification 154.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fox And Otter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 250.3 kB
  • After minification 250.3 kB
  • After compression 246.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (50%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fox And Otter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

foxandotter.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best Practices

foxandotter.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

foxandotter.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foxandotter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foxandotter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fox And Otter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: