Tools & Wizards About Us
foxscripts.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

foxscripts.net

FoxScripts.NET - FileHippo Clone Script - World Leading PHP Scripts

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

253 ms

Resources Loaded

961 ms

Page Rendered

476 ms

foxscripts.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Fox Scripts content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about foxscripts.net

Filehippo clone script, with FileFox easily make Your own software sharing website. FileFox is the best software sharing script.

Visit foxscripts.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Foxscripts.net page load time and found that the first response time was 253 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

foxscripts.net performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

80/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.151

75/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

59/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

foxscripts.net

253 ms

css

13 ms

font-awesome.min.css

67 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

48 ms

bootstrap.min.css

138 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Foxscripts.net, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (454 ms) belongs to the original domain Foxscripts.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 639.1 kB (31%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Foxscripts.net main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 30.6 kB

  • Original 37.7 kB
  • After minification 29.8 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.9 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 209.7 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fox Scripts needs image optimization as it can save up to 209.7 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 181.9 kB

  • Original 386.7 kB
  • After minification 372.2 kB
  • After compression 204.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 181.9 kB or 47% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 216.8 kB

  • Original 251.7 kB
  • After minification 221.2 kB
  • After compression 34.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foxscripts.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 216.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (48%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fox Scripts. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

foxscripts.net

foxscripts.net

253 ms

css

css

13 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

67 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

48 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

138 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

48 ms

slit-slider.css

slit-slider.css

49 ms

animate.css

animate.css

108 ms

main.css

main.css

91 ms

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

89 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

33 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

8 ms

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js

5 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

305 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

94 ms

jquery.singlePageNav.min.js

jquery.singlePageNav.min.js

72 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

180 ms

js

js

21 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

88 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

94 ms

jquery.slitslider.js

jquery.slitslider.js

202 ms

jquery.ba-cond.min.js

jquery.ba-cond.min.js

302 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

332 ms

main.js

main.js

301 ms

chatinline.aspx

chatinline.aspx

440 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

302 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

252 ms

BF8A22B3320F4E62A2A22D62AA9A6AF3b3en.gif

BF8A22B3320F4E62A2A22D62AA9A6AF3b3en.gif

406 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

268 ms

member-1.jpg

member-1.jpg

269 ms

item.jpg

item.jpg

267 ms

item2.jpg

item2.jpg

268 ms

item3.jpg

item3.jpg

268 ms

item4.jpg

item4.jpg

267 ms

item5.jpg

item5.jpg

313 ms

item6.jpg

item6.jpg

313 ms

front1.jpg

front1.jpg

311 ms

front2.jpg

front2.jpg

313 ms

front3.jpg

front3.jpg

312 ms

front4.jpg

front4.jpg

312 ms

front5.jpg

front5.jpg

314 ms

front6.jpg

front6.jpg

314 ms

testimonial.jpg

testimonial.jpg

425 ms

author.jpg

author.jpg

314 ms

quotes.png

quotes.png

313 ms

ivica.png

ivica.png

454 ms

slide_bg.png

slide_bg.png

338 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

191 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

192 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

191 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

145 ms

livechat2.aspx

livechat2.aspx

268 ms

73 ms

collect

collect

31 ms

0sTQzbapM8j.js

0sTQzbapM8j.js

16 ms

0sTQzbapM8j.js

0sTQzbapM8j.js

34 ms

Accessibility Review

foxscripts.net accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

foxscripts.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

foxscripts.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foxscripts.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foxscripts.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

foxscripts.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fox Scripts. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: