2.2 sec in total
181 ms
1.1 sec
1 sec
Visit foxtailhill.com now to see the best up-to-date Foxtail Hill content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about foxtailhill.com
Foxtail Hill offers quality craftsmanship for wooden windows and doors replacement in San Francisco. Get in touch for a free estimate!
Visit foxtailhill.comWe analyzed Foxtailhill.com page load time and found that the first response time was 181 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
foxtailhill.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
6/100
10%
Value11.8 s
0/100
25%
Value12.5 s
3/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
181 ms
47 ms
62 ms
126 ms
56 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Foxtailhill.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Foxtailhillstg.wpengine.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (229 ms) belongs to the original domain Foxtailhill.com.
Page size can be reduced by 158.7 kB (8%)
2.0 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Foxtailhill.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 158.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 158.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Foxtail Hill images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 125 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (29%)
41
29
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foxtail Hill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
foxtailhill.com
181 ms
jquery.min.js
47 ms
scrollBar.min.js
62 ms
foxtail-logo.png
126 ms
Vector.webp
56 ms
DSC_0614-scaled.webp
62 ms
offers-1.jpg
49 ms
offers-2.jpg
73 ms
Frame-48095818-min.jpg
65 ms
offers-3-1024x617.jpg
71 ms
Frame-64-min-2.jpg
73 ms
gallery-1.jpg
81 ms
gallery-2.jpg
79 ms
gallery-3.jpg
88 ms
gallery-4.jpg
99 ms
gallery-5.jpg
89 ms
gallery-6.jpg
96 ms
gallery-7.jpg
122 ms
gallery-8.jpg
103 ms
gallery-9.jpg
108 ms
gallery-10.jpg
118 ms
gallery-11.jpg
152 ms
gallery-12.jpg
119 ms
gallery-13.jpg
120 ms
gallery-14.jpg
197 ms
gallery-15.jpg
152 ms
gallery-16.jpg
152 ms
Vector.png
63 ms
email-decode.min.js
109 ms
cookie.min.js
134 ms
helpers.min.js
138 ms
headerBuilder.min.js
162 ms
menuOffsets.min.js
136 ms
menuSetUp.min.js
148 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
148 ms
swiper.min.js
158 ms
swiperInit.min.js
172 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
160 ms
mobileNavigation.min.js
157 ms
Frame-48095685-min.jpg
142 ms
min.jpeg
148 ms
Footer-min.jpg
171 ms
foxtail-footer.png
229 ms
Bailleul-Roman.woff
20 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
193 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
192 ms
foxtailhill.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
foxtailhill.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
foxtailhill.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foxtailhill.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foxtailhill.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
foxtailhill.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Foxtail Hill. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: