3.7 sec in total
846 ms
2.6 sec
232 ms
Visit fredafagh.com now to see the best up-to-date Fred Afagh content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fredafagh.com
%%excerpt%%
Visit fredafagh.comWe analyzed Fredafagh.com page load time and found that the first response time was 846 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
fredafagh.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
92/100
10%
Value3.3 s
69/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.034
100/100
15%
Value2.7 s
97/100
10%
846 ms
128 ms
132 ms
320 ms
135 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Fredafagh.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (846 ms) belongs to the original domain Fredafagh.com.
Page size can be reduced by 173.7 kB (37%)
465.1 kB
291.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Fredafagh.com main page is 465.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 216.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fred Afagh images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 119.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 119.8 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fredafagh.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (48%)
40
21
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fred Afagh. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.fredafagh.com
846 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
128 ms
style.css
132 ms
jquery.js
320 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
135 ms
afagh.js
136 ms
comment-reply.min.js
136 ms
jquery.form.min.js
190 ms
scripts.js
192 ms
hoverIntent.js
191 ms
superfish.js
193 ms
supersubs.js
193 ms
thematic-dropdowns.js
252 ms
wp-embed.min.js
255 ms
reset.css
128 ms
typography.css
129 ms
2c-r-fixed.css
129 ms
images.css
188 ms
default.css
191 ms
plugins.css
189 ms
960.css
192 ms
ga.js
5 ms
bg_home.jpg
138 ms
__utm.gif
129 ms
logo.png
130 ms
bg_menu_active.png
132 ms
home_image.jpg
192 ms
shade_large_home.png
130 ms
bg_content.png
134 ms
heading_ribbon.png
134 ms
image026-300x171.gif
135 ms
btn_view_more.png
136 ms
afagh_home.png
247 ms
Wice-photo-1-240-150x150.jpg
193 ms
Kaur-photo-1-240-150x150.jpg
195 ms
Barton-photo-1-240-150x150.jpg
194 ms
Timis-photo-1-240-150x150.jpg
196 ms
Bourassa-photo-1-240-150x150.jpg
255 ms
riazi-photo-1-2401-150x150.jpg
258 ms
olibro_footer.png
260 ms
down_arrow.png
134 ms
ColabReg-webfont.woff
133 ms
fredafagh.com accessibility score
fredafagh.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
fredafagh.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fredafagh.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fredafagh.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fredafagh.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fred Afagh. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: