Tools & Wizards About Us
freelifeproject.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 43

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

freelifeproject.com

Kundengewinnung im Internet:"Video ENTHÜLLT die 3 Schlüssel..."

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

457 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

303 ms

freelifeproject.com screenshot

About Website

Visit freelifeproject.com now to see the best up-to-date Freelifeproject content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about freelifeproject.com

Internet-Marketing: 'Die 3 Schlüssel zur Kundengewinnung im Internet...'

Visit freelifeproject.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Freelifeproject.com page load time and found that the first response time was 457 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

freelifeproject.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.041

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

freelifeproject.com

457 ms

www.web4winners.de

458 ms

www.web4winners.de

561 ms

jquery.js

230 ms

fusion.css

342 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Freelifeproject.com, 77% (24 requests) were made to Web4winners.de and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (972 ms) relates to the external source Web4winners.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 556.3 kB (40%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

820.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Freelifeproject.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 37.1 kB

  • Original 43.2 kB
  • After minification 34.6 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.6 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 518.6 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 757.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Freelifeproject needs image optimization as it can save up to 518.6 kB or 41% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 54.4 kB
  • After minification 54.4 kB
  • After compression 54.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 568 B

  • Original 3.1 kB
  • After minification 3.1 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Freelifeproject.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 568 B or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (11%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Freelifeproject. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

freelifeproject.com

freelifeproject.com

457 ms

www.web4winners.de

www.web4winners.de

458 ms

www.web4winners.de

www.web4winners.de

561 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

230 ms

fusion.css

fusion.css

342 ms

style.css

style.css

440 ms

site.css

site.css

440 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

20 ms

BG-w4w.jpg

BG-w4w.jpg

904 ms

204672515

204672515

200 ms

Content-20.png

Content-20.png

443 ms

trans.png

trans.png

112 ms

Submit.png

Submit.png

221 ms

clearpixel.gif

clearpixel.gif

114 ms

Testi.png

Testi.png

223 ms

9.png

9.png

331 ms

13.jpg

13.jpg

333 ms

Chris-Soemer--.png

Chris-Soemer--.png

330 ms

10_1.png

10_1.png

333 ms

14.png

14.png

547 ms

11_1.png

11_1.png

444 ms

12_1.png

12_1.png

444 ms

Interner-Marketing-now1.png

Interner-Marketing-now1.png

772 ms

Logo-2.png

Logo-2.png

444 ms

EndEndEnd.jpg

EndEndEnd.jpg

551 ms

Optin-3.jpg

Optin-3.jpg

972 ms

Kundengewinnung.jpg

Kundengewinnung.jpg

534 ms

Kundengewinnung-im-Internet.jpg

Kundengewinnung-im-Internet.jpg

535 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

17 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

js

js

64 ms

Accessibility Review

freelifeproject.com accessibility score

43

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

freelifeproject.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

freelifeproject.com SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Freelifeproject.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Freelifeproject.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

freelifeproject.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Freelifeproject. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: