Tools & Wizards About Us
freemail.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

freemail.ru

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

801 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

111 ms

freemail.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Freemail content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about freemail.ru

Бесплатный почтовый сервис, современный веб-интерфейс, поддержка протоколов POP3, SMTP

Visit freemail.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Freemail.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 801 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

freemail.ru performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

mail.km.ru

801 ms

css_97765121c5e9b60bc3301c0293ac79ed.css

264 ms

js_ed6bf3f2b0646ab57ee64af7bcc325ca.js

781 ms

js_778037c5435445a942447ed8b2f2f702.js

395 ms

shadow_bottom.png

137 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Freemail.ru, 9% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (801 ms) relates to the external source Mail.km.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 51.7 kB (38%)

Content Size

135.3 kB

After Optimization

83.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Freemail.ru main page is 135.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 109.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 8.4 kB
  • After minification 7.6 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 67% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 46.0 kB

  • Original 109.7 kB
  • After minification 63.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Freemail needs image optimization as it can save up to 46.0 kB or 42% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Freemail. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

mail.km.ru

mail.km.ru

801 ms

css_97765121c5e9b60bc3301c0293ac79ed.css

css_97765121c5e9b60bc3301c0293ac79ed.css

264 ms

js_ed6bf3f2b0646ab57ee64af7bcc325ca.js

js_ed6bf3f2b0646ab57ee64af7bcc325ca.js

781 ms

js_778037c5435445a942447ed8b2f2f702.js

js_778037c5435445a942447ed8b2f2f702.js

395 ms

shadow_bottom.png

shadow_bottom.png

137 ms

shadow_center.png

shadow_center.png

133 ms

logo_main.png

logo_main.png

264 ms

js_button_arrow.png

js_button_arrow.png

263 ms

fp_enter.png

fp_enter.png

267 ms

carousel_shadow.png

carousel_shadow.png

516 ms

i_footer_mail.png

i_footer_mail.png

388 ms

i_footer_help.png

i_footer_help.png

392 ms

ga.js

ga.js

67 ms

main-slide-1.png

main-slide-1.png

352 ms

js-checkbox.png

js-checkbox.png

352 ms

carousel_arrow_left.png

carousel_arrow_left.png

353 ms

main-slide-2.png

main-slide-2.png

597 ms

main-slide-3.png

main-slide-3.png

477 ms

carousel_arrow_right.png

carousel_arrow_right.png

481 ms

carousel_dot.png

carousel_dot.png

484 ms

carousel_dot-active.png

carousel_dot-active.png

482 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

SEO Factors

freemail.ru SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Freemail.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Freemail.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

freemail.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Freemail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: