3.2 sec in total
444 ms
2.7 sec
65 ms
Visit freightreport.net now to see the best up-to-date Freight Report content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about freightreport.net
Freight Estimation Platform for Dry Bulk Market. Predictive Analytics, Business Insights, Real-time Data A New Era in Freight Estimation Real-time Data with Artificial Intelligence
Visit freightreport.netWe analyzed Freightreport.net page load time and found that the first response time was 444 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
freightreport.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value5.3 s
21/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value2,120 ms
7/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.3 s
7/100
10%
444 ms
198 ms
62 ms
58 ms
1155 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Freightreport.net, 59% (16 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 22% (6 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 879.0 kB (66%)
1.3 MB
449.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Freightreport.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 823.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 823.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Freight Report images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 53.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 53.8 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (48%)
21
11
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Freight Report. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
freightreport.net
444 ms
www.thefreight.net
198 ms
minified.js
62 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
58 ms
polyfill.min.js
1155 ms
thunderbolt-commons.8add2233.bundle.min.js
78 ms
main.1550a9c2.bundle.min.js
78 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
75 ms
lodash.min.js
78 ms
react.production.min.js
76 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
79 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
77 ms
78d328_b6d2ee32792446b09f3ad4d394e8e62bf000.jpg
213 ms
78d328_9f53303a85b14fdab56d005a0852ffad~mv2.png
323 ms
78d328_fe760d9882314d0da455a6094bfc5fdd~mv2.png
322 ms
78d328_076144374116448a99abb70f6fed097d~mv2.png
331 ms
11062b_b02d1b7883d5447fb2453acb93a5102bf000.jpg
278 ms
78d328_024d6e35050c4ed5be878e065650af29~mv2.png
334 ms
bundle.min.js
106 ms
iEjm9hVxcattz37Y8gZwVbaDr2DD9WOmTsY4M3S93hU.woff
62 ms
iEjm9hVxcattz37Y8gZwVQIBIRsdTZvmhTwexVJEOCE.woff
63 ms
cormorant-garamond-v7-latin-ext_latin_cyrillic-regular.woff
63 ms
cormorant-garamond-v7-latin-ext_latin_cyrillic-700.woff
62 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
8 ms
bolt-performance
26 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
11 ms
right-arrow.svg
11 ms
freightreport.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
freightreport.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
freightreport.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Freightreport.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Freightreport.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
freightreport.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Freight Report. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: