1.7 sec in total
220 ms
1.3 sec
185 ms
Click here to check amazing Frequency content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about frequency.design
Frequency Design specialises in designing unique custom websites for authors and the publishing industry.
Visit frequency.designWe analyzed Frequency.design page load time and found that the first response time was 220 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
frequency.design performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value6.4 s
41/100
10%
Value1,470 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.052
98/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
220 ms
55 ms
67 ms
101 ms
332 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Frequency.design, 16% (7 requests) were made to Frequency.studio and 9% (4 requests) were made to Wsrv.nl. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (494 ms) relates to the external source Eu.posthog.com.
Page size can be reduced by 60.5 kB (18%)
340.4 kB
279.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Frequency.design main page is 340.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 175.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Frequency images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.6 kB or 19% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Frequency.design has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (69%)
32
10
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Frequency. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
frequency.studio
220 ms
motion-ui.min.css
55 ms
aos.css
67 ms
site.css
101 ms
nww0tiy.css
332 ms
sharing.css
240 ms
a058c6b612.js
77 ms
js
86 ms
cookieconsent.min.css
66 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
75 ms
email-decode.min.js
43 ms
jquery-match-height@0.7.2
70 ms
aos.js
64 ms
jquery.paroller.min.js
65 ms
latest.js
50 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
84 ms
p.css
51 ms
gosquared.js
92 ms
hj7538tnbc
135 ms
array.js
494 ms
f22-white-txt@3x.png
123 ms
wsrv.nl
242 ms
f23-05.jpg
106 ms
wsrv.nl
332 ms
wsrv.nl
342 ms
wsrv.nl
358 ms
js
98 ms
analytics.js
56 ms
d
156 ms
d
83 ms
d
136 ms
d
135 ms
d
135 ms
d
174 ms
d
182 ms
d
461 ms
d
202 ms
simple.gif
398 ms
main.js
10 ms
clarity.js
24 ms
pv
101 ms
collect
12 ms
chat.js
39 ms
c.gif
7 ms
frequency.design accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
frequency.design best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
frequency.design SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Frequency.design can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Frequency.design main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
frequency.design
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Frequency. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: