Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

friendfeed.com

Log into Facebook

Page Load Speed

981 ms in total

First Response

206 ms

Resources Loaded

644 ms

Page Rendered

131 ms

friendfeed.com screenshot

About Website

Visit friendfeed.com now to see the best up-to-date Friendfeed content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about friendfeed.com

Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.

Visit friendfeed.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Friendfeed.com page load time and found that the first response time was 206 ms and then it took 775 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

friendfeed.com performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

46/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.0 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

m.facebook.com

206 ms

2xs6jaqwoaL.png

48 ms

k97pj8-or6s.png

29 ms

hsts-pixel.gif

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Friendfeed.com, 25% (1 request) were made to M.facebook.com and 25% (1 request) were made to Fbsbx.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (206 ms) relates to the external source M.facebook.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 8.1 kB (31%)

Content Size

26.3 kB

After Optimization

18.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Friendfeed.com main page is 26.3 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 14.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 11.9 kB
  • After minification 11.8 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 14.4 kB
  • After minification 14.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Friendfeed images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Friendfeed. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

friendfeed.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

friendfeed.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

friendfeed.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Friendfeed.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Friendfeed.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Friendfeed. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: