Tools & Wizards About Us
frontend.ink screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

frontend.ink

Screen Printing, Embroidery & Vehicle Wraps | Frontend Solutions

Page Load Speed

14.6 sec in total

First Response

33 ms

Resources Loaded

14.1 sec

Page Rendered

434 ms

frontend.ink screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Frontend content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about frontend.ink

Our proficient team takes enough pride to offer the clients with quality vehicle wraps, embroidery and customized screen printing in Arlington, Texas at best prices.

Visit frontend.ink

Key Findings

We analyzed Frontend.ink page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 14.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

frontend.ink performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.1 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value420 ms

66/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.06

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

frontend.ink

33 ms

frontend.ink

989 ms

www.frontend.ink

7 ms

www.frontend.ink

1235 ms

gtm.js

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Frontend.ink, 3% (2 requests) were made to Assets.calendly.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Frontend.ink.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 217.5 kB (5%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

4.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Frontend.ink main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 25.3 kB

  • Original 30.5 kB
  • After minification 27.5 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 145.1 kB

  • Original 3.7 MB
  • After minification 3.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Frontend images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 380.8 kB
  • After minification 379.3 kB
  • After compression 376.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 42.8 kB

  • Original 102.6 kB
  • After minification 101.7 kB
  • After compression 59.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Frontend.ink needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.8 kB or 42% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (31%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

36

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Frontend. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

frontend.ink

frontend.ink

33 ms

frontend.ink

frontend.ink

989 ms

www.frontend.ink

www.frontend.ink

7 ms

www.frontend.ink

www.frontend.ink

1235 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

80 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

972 ms

plugins.min.css

plugins.min.css

1219 ms

LCLightbox.css

LCLightbox.css

998 ms

sweetalert.min.css

sweetalert.min.css

976 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

985 ms

responsive.min.css

responsive.min.css

2546 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

143 ms

api.js

api.js

46 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

2177 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

2635 ms

LCLightbox.js

LCLightbox.js

1952 ms

sweetalert.min.js

sweetalert.min.js

2100 ms

date.format.js

date.format.js

2165 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

3148 ms

custom.min.js

custom.min.js

3071 ms

widget.css

widget.css

148 ms

widget.js

widget.js

264 ms

logo.png

logo.png

958 ms

office.jpg

office.jpg

1423 ms

office.jpg

office.jpg

1883 ms

your-one-stop-solution-for-dtg-screen-printing-embroidery-amp-vehicle-wraps.png

your-one-stop-solution-for-dtg-screen-printing-embroidery-amp-vehicle-wraps.png

2214 ms

shadow_service.png

shadow_service.png

1498 ms

screen-printing-icon.png

screen-printing-icon.png

1560 ms

screen-printing-icon-hover.png

screen-printing-icon-hover.png

1913 ms

embroidery-icon.png

embroidery-icon.png

2367 ms

embroidery-icon-hover.png

embroidery-icon-hover.png

2441 ms

vehicle-wraps-icon.png

vehicle-wraps-icon.png

2522 ms

vehicle-wraps-icon-hover.png

vehicle-wraps-icon-hover.png

2844 ms

signs-amp-banners-icon.png

signs-amp-banners-icon.png

4369 ms

signs-amp-banners-icon-hover.png

signs-amp-banners-icon-hover.png

3211 ms

direct-to-garment-icon.png

direct-to-garment-icon.png

3322 ms

direct-to-garment-icon-hover.png

direct-to-garment-icon-hover.png

3405 ms

flyers-amp-business-cards-icon.png

flyers-amp-business-cards-icon.png

3491 ms

flyers-amp-business-cards-icon-hover.png

flyers-amp-business-cards-icon-hover.png

3951 ms

the-screen-printing-process-image.png

the-screen-printing-process-image.png

6118 ms

play.png

play.png

4285 ms

brush.png

brush.png

4370 ms

bg_gallery.jpg

bg_gallery.jpg

4435 ms

screen-printing-1607492282-2.jpeg

screen-printing-1607492282-2.jpeg

5631 ms

promotional-products-1607494028-0.jpeg

promotional-products-1607494028-0.jpeg

5951 ms

promotional-products-1607494028-1.jpeg

promotional-products-1607494028-1.jpeg

5797 ms

promotional-products-1607494028-2.jpeg

promotional-products-1607494028-2.jpeg

5785 ms

promotional-products-1607494029-3.jpeg

promotional-products-1607494029-3.jpeg

5847 ms

promotional-products-1607494029-4.jpeg

promotional-products-1607494029-4.jpeg

7279 ms

promotional-products-1607494029-5.jpeg

promotional-products-1607494029-5.jpeg

7433 ms

promotional-products-1607494029-6.jpeg

promotional-products-1607494029-6.jpeg

7500 ms

promotional-products-1607494029-7.jpeg

promotional-products-1607494029-7.jpeg

7262 ms

direct-to-garment-1642656327-0.jpg

direct-to-garment-1642656327-0.jpg

7418 ms

embroidery-solution-1607493587-4.jpeg

embroidery-solution-1607493587-4.jpeg

7786 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

93 ms

embroidery-solution-1607493587-3.jpeg

embroidery-solution-1607493587-3.jpeg

9112 ms

sofiapro-light-webfont.woff

sofiapro-light-webfont.woff

8393 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

8588 ms

gilroy-extrabold-webfont.woff

gilroy-extrabold-webfont.woff

7992 ms

permanentmarker-webfont.woff

permanentmarker-webfont.woff

7968 ms

bg_footer.jpg

bg_footer.jpg

7831 ms

Accessibility Review

frontend.ink accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

frontend.ink best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

frontend.ink SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Frontend.ink can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Frontend.ink main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

frontend.ink

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Frontend. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: