Tools & Wizards About Us
fsafp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

fsafp.com

Five Star Automatic Fire Protection, LLC - Home

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

188 ms

Resources Loaded

706 ms

Page Rendered

196 ms

fsafp.com screenshot

About Website

Visit fsafp.com now to see the best up-to-date Fsafp content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fsafp.com

Fire Protection

Visit fsafp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fsafp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 188 ms and then it took 902 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fsafp.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value460 ms

62/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fsafp.com

188 ms

index.html

76 ms

gdprscript.js

71 ms

font.css

11 ms

font.css

13 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Fsafp.com, 68% (26 requests) were made to Cdn2.editmysite.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (246 ms) belongs to the original domain Fsafp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 59.6 kB (9%)

Content Size

650.0 kB

After Optimization

590.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fsafp.com main page is 650.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 448.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 21.6 kB

  • Original 27.1 kB
  • After minification 26.2 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 124.3 kB
  • After minification 120.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fsafp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 25.3 kB

  • Original 448.9 kB
  • After minification 447.7 kB
  • After compression 423.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 49.6 kB
  • After minification 48.0 kB
  • After compression 40.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fsafp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (83%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fsafp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fsafp.com

fsafp.com

188 ms

index.html

index.html

76 ms

gdprscript.js

gdprscript.js

71 ms

font.css

font.css

11 ms

font.css

font.css

13 ms

font.css

font.css

13 ms

MutationObserver.js

MutationObserver.js

129 ms

sites.css

sites.css

16 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

21 ms

social-icons.css

social-icons.css

13 ms

main_style.css

main_style.css

140 ms

font.css

font.css

16 ms

font.css

font.css

21 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

29 ms

stl.js

stl.js

20 ms

main.js

main.js

26 ms

stl.js

stl.js

26 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

194 ms

jquery.pxuMenu.js

jquery.pxuMenu.js

125 ms

jquery.trend.js

jquery.trend.js

191 ms

jquery.revealer.js

jquery.revealer.js

191 ms

custom-1.js

custom-1.js

216 ms

main-customer-accounts-site.js

main-customer-accounts-site.js

25 ms

default-bg.jpg

default-bg.jpg

246 ms

3944493.png

3944493.png

156 ms

regular.woff

regular.woff

10 ms

bold.woff

bold.woff

9 ms

regular.woff

regular.woff

11 ms

light.woff

light.woff

11 ms

bold.woff

bold.woff

11 ms

bolditalic.woff

bolditalic.woff

11 ms

italic.woff

italic.woff

11 ms

lightitalic.woff

lightitalic.woff

11 ms

regular.woff

regular.woff

23 ms

bold.woff

bold.woff

22 ms

bold.woff

bold.woff

22 ms

regular.woff

regular.woff

21 ms

light.woff

light.woff

23 ms

Accessibility Review

fsafp.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

fsafp.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

fsafp.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fsafp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fsafp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fsafp.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fsafp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: