Tools & Wizards About Us
fscw.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

fscw.us

Comprehensive Vehicle Detailing: Interior & Exterior, Machine & Hand Wash services | Full Service Car Wash

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

59 ms

Resources Loaded

695 ms

Page Rendered

535 ms

fscw.us screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Fscw content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fscw.us

Full Service Car Wash (FSCW) offers the comprehensive wash and detailing experience for any vehicle. Cars, motorcycles, trucks, boats, you name it, we can handle it. Stop in for any detailed express s...

Visit fscw.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Fscw.us page load time and found that the first response time was 59 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fscw.us performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value840 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.177

68/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fscw.us

59 ms

platform.client.min.css

41 ms

trunk.min.css

81 ms

css

81 ms

platform.client.min.js

78 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Fscw.us, 50% (13 requests) were made to Content.app-sources.com and 31% (8 requests) were made to Static.web-repository.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (428 ms) relates to the external source Content.app-sources.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 183.9 kB (34%)

Content Size

541.7 kB

After Optimization

357.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fscw.us main page is 541.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 216.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 183.7 kB

  • Original 205.6 kB
  • After minification 175.6 kB
  • After compression 21.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 30.1 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 183.7 kB or 89% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 56 B

  • Original 216.0 kB
  • After minification 216.0 kB
  • After compression 215.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 126 B

  • Original 120.1 kB
  • After minification 120.1 kB
  • After compression 120.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fscw.us has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (23%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fscw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fscw.us

fscw.us

59 ms

platform.client.min.css

platform.client.min.css

41 ms

trunk.min.css

trunk.min.css

81 ms

css

css

81 ms

platform.client.min.js

platform.client.min.js

78 ms

hit.js

hit.js

76 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

109 ms

FSCW_Logo-3485823.png

FSCW_Logo-3485823.png

143 ms

trunk-1024.min.css

trunk-1024.min.css

25 ms

shutterstock_2477755421-3492327.jpg

shutterstock_2477755421-3492327.jpg

428 ms

IMG_3662-3488375.jpg

IMG_3662-3488375.jpg

295 ms

IMG_3070-3488186.jpg

IMG_3070-3488186.jpg

298 ms

IMG_0601-3488596.jpg

IMG_0601-3488596.jpg

297 ms

IMG_0346-3488517.jpg

IMG_0346-3488517.jpg

296 ms

IMG_7645-3488665.jpg

IMG_7645-3488665.jpg

297 ms

IMG_3976-3488409.jpg

IMG_3976-3488409.jpg

357 ms

pfrm_expl_unsplsh-62vi3TG5EDg-3677716.webp

pfrm_expl_unsplsh-62vi3TG5EDg-3677716.webp

322 ms

IMG_0003-3488499.jpg

IMG_0003-3488499.jpg

399 ms

logo_google-3675231.svg

logo_google-3675231.svg

320 ms

google_5-3675232.png

google_5-3675232.png

410 ms

FSCW_Logo-3485823.png

FSCW_Logo-3485823.png

323 ms

trunk-768.min.css

trunk-768.min.css

23 ms

trunk-480.min.css

trunk-480.min.css

14 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

10 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

47 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

47 ms

Accessibility Review

fscw.us accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

fscw.us best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

fscw.us SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fscw.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fscw.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fscw.us

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fscw. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: