5.8 sec in total
1.1 sec
4.4 sec
355 ms
Click here to check amazing Fuel Card content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fuelcard.report
Not sure which Fuel Card to choose? We’ve shopped around as a business to make comparing offers, fees and discounts simple.
Visit fuelcard.reportWe analyzed Fuelcard.report page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
fuelcard.report performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
13/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value9.3 s
13/100
10%
Value1,740 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value13.3 s
12/100
10%
1125 ms
17 ms
1074 ms
1080 ms
46 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Fuelcard.report, 13% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Media.fuelcard.report.
Page size can be reduced by 330.2 kB (33%)
1.0 MB
678.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Fuelcard.report main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 424.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 279.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 279.3 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 251 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fuel Card images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 47.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fuelcard.report has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (81%)
81
15
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fuel Card. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fuelcard.report
1125 ms
style.css
17 ms
style.min.css
1074 ms
lazyload-shared.css
1080 ms
font-awesome.min.css
46 ms
magnific-popup.css
1067 ms
slider-jquery-ui.css
29 ms
select2.min.css
26 ms
pj.css
66 ms
abn-lookup.css
41 ms
css
35 ms
dashicons.min.css
54 ms
front-end.css
60 ms
default.css
90 ms
jquery.min.js
95 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
96 ms
gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css
92 ms
gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css
1187 ms
gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css
117 ms
formreset.min.css
117 ms
formsmain.min.css
132 ms
readyclass.min.css
129 ms
browsers.min.css
141 ms
gf_image_choices_legacy.css
144 ms
bundle.js
188 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
154 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
169 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
187 ms
hooks.min.js
202 ms
wordlift-cloud.js
223 ms
lazyload-shared.js
212 ms
lazyload-youtube.js
222 ms
lazyload-vimeo.js
232 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
235 ms
superfish.min.js
246 ms
superfish.args.min.js
256 ms
skip-links.min.js
258 ms
fcr-abn-form-event.js
264 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
255 ms
slider-jquery-ui.js
296 ms
select2.full.min.js
256 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
262 ms
pj.js
264 ms
abn-lookup-events.js
273 ms
css2
29 ms
css2
41 ms
css2
49 ms
css2
41 ms
responsive-menus.min.js
246 ms
site-reviews.js
1386 ms
dom-ready.min.js
250 ms
i18n.min.js
261 ms
a11y.min.js
273 ms
jquery.json.min.js
272 ms
gravityforms.min.js
272 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
287 ms
utils.min.js
286 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
303 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
303 ms
jetsloth-lightbox.js
312 ms
gf_image_choices.js
311 ms
gtm.js
380 ms
benefits-of-fleetcard.jpg
983 ms
angel.svg
33 ms
guide-image-eligibility.svg
1263 ms
guide-image-eligibility-mob.svg
1285 ms
quote.svg
1107 ms
why-diesel-prices-are-higher-than-petrol-fuel-card-300x167.jpg
1653 ms
virtual-cards-vs-business-fuel-card-300x167.jpg
1472 ms
logo.png
1422 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf
83 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf
121 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf
455 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf
457 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf
458 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf
463 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1s.ttf
461 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf
459 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf
460 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf
459 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf
462 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf
462 ms
icon-menu.svg
51 ms
check-circle-menu.svg
1174 ms
eligibility-menu-icon.svg
330 ms
js
139 ms
analytics.js
183 ms
insight.min.js
179 ms
hotjar-1893398.js
228 ms
stat.js
213 ms
fbevents.js
81 ms
collect
26 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
77 ms
modules.478d49d6cc21ec95d184.js
19 ms
fuelcard.report accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
fuelcard.report best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
fuelcard.report SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fuelcard.report can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fuelcard.report main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fuelcard.report
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fuel Card. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: