7.9 sec in total
1.2 sec
5.8 sec
867 ms
Click here to check amazing Fuel Card content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fuelcard.report
Not sure which Fuel Card to choose? We’ve shopped around as a business to make comparing offers, fees and discounts simple.
Visit fuelcard.reportWe analyzed Fuelcard.report page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
fuelcard.report performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.7 s
0/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value17.4 s
0/100
10%
Value30,140 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value42.5 s
0/100
10%
1229 ms
147 ms
261 ms
364 ms
391 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Fuelcard.report, 13% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Media.fuelcard.report. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Media.fuelcard.report.
Page size can be reduced by 357.1 kB (37%)
973.0 kB
615.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Fuelcard.report main page is 973.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 344.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 306.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 306.0 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 256 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fuel Card images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 47.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 47.3 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fuelcard.report has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (81%)
77
15
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fuel Card. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fuelcard.report
1229 ms
style.css
147 ms
style.min.css
261 ms
mapbox-gl.css
364 ms
mapbox-gl-geocoder.css
391 ms
fuelmaps.css
1197 ms
lazyload-shared.css
347 ms
font-awesome.min.css
239 ms
magnific-popup.css
191 ms
slider-jquery-ui.css
320 ms
select2.min.css
371 ms
pj.css
475 ms
abn-lookup.css
446 ms
css
455 ms
dashicons.min.css
407 ms
front-end.css
439 ms
default.css
765 ms
jquery.min.js
812 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
807 ms
mapbox-gl.js
826 ms
mapbox-gl-geocoder.min.js
408 ms
gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css
758 ms
gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css
766 ms
gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css
768 ms
formreset.min.css
788 ms
formsmain.min.css
851 ms
readyclass.min.css
803 ms
browsers.min.css
785 ms
gf_image_choices_legacy.css
851 ms
common.js
802 ms
bundle.js
846 ms
hooks.min.js
844 ms
wordlift-cloud.js
859 ms
lazyload-shared.js
883 ms
lazyload-youtube.js
883 ms
lazyload-vimeo.js
881 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
892 ms
superfish.min.js
887 ms
superfish.args.min.js
930 ms
skip-links.min.js
893 ms
fcr-abn-form-event.js
904 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
866 ms
slider-jquery-ui.js
857 ms
select2.full.min.js
710 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
708 ms
pj.js
710 ms
abn-lookup-events.js
688 ms
responsive-menus.min.js
641 ms
site-reviews.js
640 ms
dom-ready.min.js
624 ms
i18n.min.js
595 ms
css2
423 ms
css2
446 ms
css2
454 ms
css2
453 ms
a11y.min.js
320 ms
jquery.json.min.js
266 ms
gravityforms.min.js
266 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
270 ms
utils.min.js
243 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
245 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
223 ms
jetsloth-lightbox.js
241 ms
gf_image_choices.js
236 ms
gtm.js
494 ms
buyers-guide-to-fluctuating-fuel-card-fees.jpg
1237 ms
angel.svg
339 ms
guide-image-eligibility.svg
163 ms
guide-image-eligibility-mob.svg
288 ms
quote.svg
153 ms
viva-energy-boosts-shell-cards-market-presence-with-otr-acquisition-300x167.jpg
2143 ms
choosing-between-a-vehicle-card-or-personal-fuel-card-300x167.jpg
2145 ms
logo.png
2148 ms
image-20-1.png
2144 ms
image-20-4.png
2145 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf
404 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf
855 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf
860 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf
859 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf
857 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf
857 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1s.ttf
861 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf
861 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf
877 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf
877 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf
876 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf
1089 ms
icon-menu.svg
310 ms
check-circle-menu.svg
298 ms
eligibility-menu-icon.svg
305 ms
fuelcard.report accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
fuelcard.report best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
fuelcard.report SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fuelcard.report can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fuelcard.report main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fuelcard.report
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fuel Card. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: