Tools & Wizards About Us
fueltransport.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

fueltransport.com

Freight Shipping Carrier | 3PL Fulfillment Company | Fuel Transport

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

268 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

fueltransport.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to fueltransport.com homepage info - get ready to check Fuel Transport best content right away, or after learning these important things about fueltransport.com

Freight Shipping Carrier and 3PL Fulfillment Company. We provide efficient, personalized transportation logistics, as well as warehouse and distribution solutions.

Visit fueltransport.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fueltransport.com page load time and found that the first response time was 268 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fueltransport.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value50.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,520 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value46.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fueltransport.com

268 ms

fueltransport.com

167 ms

js

175 ms

6331f29560d4e8395d43bad4

389 ms

font-awesome.css

103 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Fueltransport.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (601 ms) belongs to the original domain Fueltransport.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (13%)

Content Size

13.1 MB

After Optimization

11.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Fueltransport.com main page is 13.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 12.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 102.0 kB

  • Original 127.3 kB
  • After minification 102.2 kB
  • After compression 25.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 25.1 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 12.4 MB
  • After minification 11.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fuel Transport needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 334.7 kB

  • Original 583.6 kB
  • After minification 583.6 kB
  • After compression 248.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 334.7 kB or 57% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (53%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fuel Transport. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fueltransport.com

fueltransport.com

268 ms

fueltransport.com

fueltransport.com

167 ms

js

js

175 ms

6331f29560d4e8395d43bad4

6331f29560d4e8395d43bad4

389 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

103 ms

main.css

main.css

76 ms

api.js

api.js

111 ms

formidableforms.css

formidableforms.css

112 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

128 ms

styles.css

styles.css

120 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

101 ms

cookieNSCconsent.min.css

cookieNSCconsent.min.css

131 ms

widget.js

widget.js

151 ms

cookieNSCconsent.min.js

cookieNSCconsent.min.js

161 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

161 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

160 ms

frm.min.js

frm.min.js

185 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

123 ms

underscore-min.js

underscore-min.js

115 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

149 ms

isotope.pkgd.js

isotope.pkgd.js

374 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

109 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

115 ms

player.js

player.js

157 ms

boot.js

boot.js

182 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

275 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

250 ms

tracking.js

tracking.js

350 ms

fuel-logo-en.png

fuel-logo-en.png

228 ms

fuel_trans.jpg

fuel_trans.jpg

317 ms

Scroll-Down-white.gif

Scroll-Down-white.gif

229 ms

Ciff_HomePage2.jpg

Ciff_HomePage2.jpg

232 ms

AirPlaneTail_HomePage5.jpg

AirPlaneTail_HomePage5.jpg

228 ms

PZ9_2433-scaled-e1726685203796.jpg

PZ9_2433-scaled-e1726685203796.jpg

231 ms

Screenshot-2024-07-23-at-4.08.44%E2%80%AFPM.png

Screenshot-2024-07-23-at-4.08.44%E2%80%AFPM.png

328 ms

Screenshot-2024-07-20-at-12.16.32%E2%80%AFPM.png

Screenshot-2024-07-20-at-12.16.32%E2%80%AFPM.png

325 ms

B1.jpg

B1.jpg

308 ms

fuel2024_274-scaled.jpg

fuel2024_274-scaled.jpg

315 ms

fuel2024_453-scaled.jpg

fuel2024_453-scaled.jpg

315 ms

hello-1.jpg

hello-1.jpg

403 ms

hello_fr.jpg

hello_fr.jpg

405 ms

Untitled-design-8.png

Untitled-design-8.png

404 ms

new_background_web.jpg

new_background_web.jpg

401 ms

more_convo.jpg

more_convo.jpg

401 ms

fuel-055-scaled-e1678114169941.jpg

fuel-055-scaled-e1678114169941.jpg

401 ms

innovation_fuel.jpg

innovation_fuel.jpg

437 ms

A2-scaled.jpg

A2-scaled.jpg

430 ms

resilience-2.jpg

resilience-2.jpg

472 ms

2-satiwinder.png

2-satiwinder.png

506 ms

icon-cross.png

icon-cross.png

429 ms

patern.jpg

patern.jpg

429 ms

lineto-circular-book.woff

lineto-circular-book.woff

536 ms

lineto-circular-medium.woff

lineto-circular-medium.woff

559 ms

lineto-circular-bold.woff

lineto-circular-bold.woff

601 ms

lineto-circular-black.woff

lineto-circular-black.woff

573 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

102 ms

isotope.pkgd.js

isotope.pkgd.js

109 ms

141236896559109

141236896559109

83 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

58 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

64 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

5 ms

Accessibility Review

fueltransport.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

fueltransport.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

fueltransport.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fueltransport.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fueltransport.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fueltransport.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fuel Transport. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: