Tools & Wizards About Us
funeral.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

funeral.net

Armstrong Funeral Home

Page Load Speed

271 ms in total

First Response

44 ms

Resources Loaded

227 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

funeral.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to funeral.net homepage info - get ready to check Funeral best content right away, or after learning these important things about funeral.net

Visit funeral.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Funeral.net page load time and found that the first response time was 44 ms and then it took 227 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

funeral.net performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

48/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,150 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.041

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

funeral.net

44 ms

www.funeral.net

42 ms

www.funeral.net

59 ms

gtm.js

50 ms

gtm.js

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Funeral.net, 41% (7 requests) were made to D2zeeo94hsmapq.cloudfront.net and 18% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (72 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 181.2 kB (56%)

Content Size

323.3 kB

After Optimization

142.1 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Funeral.net main page is 323.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 227.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 181.0 kB

  • Original 227.1 kB
  • After minification 225.7 kB
  • After compression 46.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 181.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 233 B

  • Original 96.2 kB
  • After minification 96.2 kB
  • After compression 96.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (86%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Funeral. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

funeral.net

funeral.net

44 ms

www.funeral.net

www.funeral.net

42 ms

www.funeral.net

www.funeral.net

59 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

50 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

67 ms

vue.min.js

vue.min.js

39 ms

vuex.min.js

vuex.min.js

61 ms

chunk-store.8e42d9ef.js

chunk-store.8e42d9ef.js

31 ms

chunk-app.0ff5f1ad.js

chunk-app.0ff5f1ad.js

33 ms

chunk-windows-size.fc7b6a05.js

chunk-windows-size.fc7b6a05.js

37 ms

chunk-init-data.73bd3877.js

chunk-init-data.73bd3877.js

62 ms

chunk-generate-css.9984f9fc.js

chunk-generate-css.9984f9fc.js

46 ms

chunk-vendors.d07f823b.js

chunk-vendors.d07f823b.js

46 ms

app.c40b6e24.js

app.c40b6e24.js

47 ms

css

css

56 ms

js

js

72 ms

GetAntiforgeryToken.js

GetAntiforgeryToken.js

11 ms

Accessibility Review

funeral.net accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

funeral.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

funeral.net SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Funeral.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Funeral.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

funeral.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Funeral. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: