1.6 sec in total
121 ms
1.4 sec
86 ms
Visit further.space now to see the best up-to-date Further content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about further.space
FURTHER.SPACE offer glamping holidays with a difference in Ireland & Scotland with luxury glamping pods in woodland, farm & lakeside settings.
Visit further.spaceWe analyzed Further.space page load time and found that the first response time was 121 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
further.space performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value13.1 s
0/100
25%
Value6.0 s
47/100
10%
Value2,260 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.299
40/100
15%
Value14.0 s
10/100
10%
121 ms
150 ms
30 ms
80 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Further.space, 9% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (623 ms) belongs to the original domain Further.space.
Page size can be reduced by 29.1 kB (8%)
358.4 kB
329.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Further.space main page is 358.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 243.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 560 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Further.space has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (90%)
63
6
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Further. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
further.space
121 ms
further.space
150 ms
banner.js
30 ms
way7yzg.css
80 ms
theme.min.css
26 ms
style.css
146 ms
style.min.css
145 ms
header-footer.min.css
132 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
38 ms
post-5.css
45 ms
all.min.css
49 ms
v4-shims.min.css
62 ms
public.css
170 ms
jet-elements.css
79 ms
jet-elements-skin.css
87 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
101 ms
swiper.min.css
200 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
127 ms
post-7.css
151 ms
post-98.css
253 ms
post-463.css
262 ms
further-space.min.css
171 ms
fontawesome.min.css
289 ms
solid.min.css
280 ms
brands.min.css
217 ms
jquery.min.js
578 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
247 ms
js
65 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
282 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
367 ms
post-716.css
372 ms
post-357.css
312 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
308 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
402 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
336 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
342 ms
hooks.min.js
367 ms
vue.min.js
368 ms
jet-menu-public-scripts.js
499 ms
35 ms
fs-components.esm.js
482 ms
fs-components.js
470 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
469 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
479 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
464 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
457 ms
p.css
24 ms
i18n.min.js
547 ms
frontend.min.js
559 ms
waypoints.min.js
438 ms
core.min.js
412 ms
frontend.min.js
623 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
424 ms
jet-elements.min.js
421 ms
widgets-scripts.js
482 ms
gtm.js
54 ms
analytics.js
133 ms
d
133 ms
d
133 ms
d
133 ms
BerlingskeSerif-Md.woff
266 ms
BerlingskeSerif-Blk.woff
152 ms
js
138 ms
insight.min.js
129 ms
events.js
175 ms
fbevents.js
101 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
185 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
126 ms
d
53 ms
d
59 ms
d
92 ms
collect
33 ms
collect
59 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
145 ms
ga-audiences
32 ms
further.space accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
further.space best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
further.space SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Further.space can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Further.space main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
further.space
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Further. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: