Tools & Wizards About Us
fusecheck.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

fusecheck.com

Fuse box diagrams, fuse layouts and fuse assignment for various cars

Page Load Speed

813 ms in total

First Response

74 ms

Resources Loaded

567 ms

Page Rendered

172 ms

fusecheck.com screenshot

About Website

Visit fusecheck.com now to see the best up-to-date Fuse Check content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fusecheck.com

The information on our website will help you to check your car's faults related to blown fuses - here you will find fuses diagrams and fuse assignment.

Visit fusecheck.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fusecheck.com page load time and found that the first response time was 74 ms and then it took 739 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fusecheck.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

87/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,730 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.383

27/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fusecheck.com

74 ms

fusecheck.com

213 ms

css

44 ms

jquery.js

20 ms

adsbygoogle.js

145 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Fusecheck.com, 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (213 ms) belongs to the original domain Fusecheck.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 296.0 kB (52%)

Content Size

569.6 kB

After Optimization

273.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Fusecheck.com main page is 569.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 343.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 284.8 kB

  • Original 343.4 kB
  • After minification 343.4 kB
  • After compression 58.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 284.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 92.9 kB
  • After minification 87.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fuse Check images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 133.3 kB
  • After minification 133.3 kB
  • After compression 127.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (24%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fuse Check. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fusecheck.com

fusecheck.com

74 ms

fusecheck.com

fusecheck.com

213 ms

css

css

44 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

20 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

145 ms

autoptimize_11138eb77cdf142b888a2b9fb015753c.js

autoptimize_11138eb77cdf142b888a2b9fb015753c.js

38 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

140 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

84 ms

font

font

58 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

75 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

76 ms

name_white1.jpg

name_white1.jpg

36 ms

acura1.png

acura1.png

32 ms

Alfa-Romeo.png

Alfa-Romeo.png

37 ms

Audi.png

Audi.png

42 ms

BMW2.png

BMW2.png

54 ms

Buick.png

Buick.png

57 ms

Cadillac.png

Cadillac.png

58 ms

Chevrolet.png

Chevrolet.png

83 ms

Chrysler.png

Chrysler.png

58 ms

citroen.png

citroen.png

63 ms

Accessibility Review

fusecheck.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

fusecheck.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

fusecheck.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fusecheck.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fusecheck.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fusecheck.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fuse Check. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: