3.1 sec in total
648 ms
2.1 sec
317 ms
Visit futurecarsreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Futurecarsreview content for Indonesia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about futurecarsreview.com
News,Spec,Price
Visit futurecarsreview.comWe analyzed Futurecarsreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 648 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
futurecarsreview.com performance score
648 ms
75 ms
112 ms
145 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Futurecarsreview.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 9% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (648 ms) belongs to the original domain Futurecarsreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 192.8 kB (35%)
549.2 kB
356.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Futurecarsreview.com main page is 549.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 231.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Futurecarsreview images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 106.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 106.5 kB or 48% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Futurecarsreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (51%)
53
26
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Futurecarsreview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.futurecarsreview.com
648 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
75 ms
sociable.css
112 ms
style.css
145 ms
css
25 ms
jquery.js
198 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
133 ms
sociable.js
150 ms
vuible.js
141 ms
addtofavorites.js
166 ms
plusone.js
48 ms
brand
15 ms
adsbygoogle.js
4 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
211 ms
simplecatch_slider.js
212 ms
simplecatch_search.js
210 ms
brand
66 ms
978.css
78 ms
plusone.js
167 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
136 ms
header-bg.jpg
122 ms
header-top-footer-bg.jpg
122 ms
LOGO1-300x114.png
120 ms
2017-Kia-Optima-210x210.jpg
157 ms
2016-Kia-Cadenza-210x210.jpg
156 ms
2017-Nissan-X-Trail-FCV-210x210.jpg
156 ms
2017-Jaguar-F-Type-SVR-Coupe-210x210.jpeg
176 ms
2016-Renault-Kadjar-210x210.jpg
175 ms
2016-Nissan-Maxima-SR-Midnight-rear-210x210.jpg
175 ms
2016-Hyundai-Creta-210x210.jpg
217 ms
2017-Ford-Escape-210x210.jpg
207 ms
2016-Bentley-Bentayga-210x210.jpg
209 ms
2016-Mitsubishi-Outlander-210x210.jpg
232 ms
LOGO-150x125.png
224 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
187 ms
ca-pub-6981719231712522.js
162 ms
zrt_lookup.html
161 ms
show_ads_impl.js
65 ms
post-by-seperator.jpg
196 ms
ul-bg-prev.png
264 ms
ul-bg.png
254 ms
regstat.aspx
558 ms
ads
313 ms
osd.js
65 ms
ads
303 ms
ads
271 ms
ads
400 ms
abg.js
26 ms
m_js_controller.js
4 ms
favicon
79 ms
s
11 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
28 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
9 ms
x_button_blue2.png
10 ms
belcounter_line.gif
97 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
3 ms
futurecarsreview.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futurecarsreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Futurecarsreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
futurecarsreview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Futurecarsreview. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: