9.3 sec in total
3.1 sec
5.8 sec
377 ms
Visit futurefoundation.net now to see the best up-to-date Futurefoundation content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about futurefoundation.net
Trends Platform, Foresight Factory, formerly Future Foundation, helps leading companies 'Own the Future' through consumer trends data, analysis & prediction
Visit futurefoundation.netWe analyzed Futurefoundation.net page load time and found that the first response time was 3.1 sec and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
futurefoundation.net performance score
3104 ms
33 ms
778 ms
845 ms
775 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Futurefoundation.net, 4% (2 requests) were made to Platform.linkedin.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Futurefoundation.net.
Page size can be reduced by 281.6 kB (25%)
1.1 MB
837.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Futurefoundation.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 707.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Futurefoundation images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 168.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 168.6 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 76.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Futurefoundation.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 76.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (75%)
53
13
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Futurefoundation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
futurefoundation.net
3104 ms
css
33 ms
normalize.min.css
778 ms
main.css
845 ms
skeleton.css
775 ms
modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js
858 ms
js
98 ms
cnss.css
887 ms
styles.css
906 ms
style.css
947 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.6.pack.css
1028 ms
cn-user.css
1082 ms
chosen.css
1085 ms
jquery.qtip.min.css
1083 ms
style_2.1.2.css
1125 ms
jquery.js
1468 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1205 ms
cnss.js
1256 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1262 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
1184 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
1235 ms
jquery.ui.mouse.min.js
1240 ms
jquery.ui.sortable.min.js
1416 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1342 ms
scripts.js
1337 ms
navigation.js
1416 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
1429 ms
jquery.preloader.js
1521 ms
cn-user.js
1527 ms
script_no_follow_2.1.2.js
1522 ms
in.js
4 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.6.pack.js
1684 ms
jquery.easing.pack.js
1605 ms
jquery.mousewheel.pack.js
1607 ms
plugins.js
1848 ms
main.js
1701 ms
bg-tile1.png
176 ms
1389020201_linkedin-24.png
311 ms
1389020284_google-plus-icon.png
380 ms
1389018407_Twitter_001_24x24.png
392 ms
future-foundation.png
467 ms
future-foundation-mobile.png
497 ms
search.png
498 ms
menu-btn.png
535 ms
nVision-logo.png
543 ms
880x220_D.jpg
1301 ms
880x220_A.jpg
1212 ms
TrendTraining_560x300.jpg
1079 ms
Telephone_330x180.jpg
806 ms
as-seen-in.png
907 ms
K6ngFdK5haaaRGBV8waDwA.ttf
13 ms
nHiQo1BypvYzt95zlPq1TvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
14 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
34 ms
ga.js
32 ms
ajax-loader.gif
535 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
futurefoundation.net SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futurefoundation.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Futurefoundation.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
futurefoundation.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Futurefoundation. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: