Tools & Wizards About Us
futureline.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

futureline.net

Future Line Truck Equipment | Truck Equipment Supplier in Cedar Rapids

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

36 ms

Resources Loaded

982 ms

Page Rendered

312 ms

futureline.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Future Line content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about futureline.net

Visit futureline.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Futureline.net page load time and found that the first response time was 36 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

futureline.net performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value26.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value580 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.032

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

futureline.net

36 ms

futureline.com

130 ms

bootstrap.min.css

59 ms

styles.css

228 ms

all.js

116 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Futureline.net, 60% (26 requests) were made to Futureline.com and 14% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (566 ms) relates to the external source Futureline.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 509.1 kB (11%)

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

3.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Futureline.net main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 16.6 kB

  • Original 20.6 kB
  • After minification 16.0 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.6 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 404.7 kB

  • Original 3.8 MB
  • After minification 3.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Future Line needs image optimization as it can save up to 404.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 87.6 kB

  • Original 647.6 kB
  • After minification 647.6 kB
  • After compression 560.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.6 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 267 B

  • Original 2.5 kB
  • After minification 2.5 kB
  • After compression 2.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Futureline.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 267 B or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (24%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Future Line. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

futureline.net

futureline.net

36 ms

futureline.com

futureline.com

130 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

59 ms

styles.css

styles.css

228 ms

all.js

all.js

116 ms

css

css

47 ms

css

css

66 ms

js

js

78 ms

Future_Line.js

Future_Line.js

28 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

74 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

314 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

23 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

86 ms

future-line-logo.png

future-line-logo.png

124 ms

tuff_trucks.png

tuff_trucks.png

566 ms

adrian.png

adrian.png

127 ms

dakota_bodies.png

dakota_bodies.png

182 ms

StellarLogoHeader-1920w.png

StellarLogoHeader-1920w.png

178 ms

hi_way.png

hi_way.png

179 ms

hyva.png

hyva.png

179 ms

viking.png

viking.png

179 ms

henke.png

henke.png

193 ms

boss.png

boss.png

289 ms

western.png

western.png

238 ms

galion.png

galion.png

237 ms

knapheide.png

knapheide.png

236 ms

weather_guard.png

weather_guard.png

240 ms

maxton.png

maxton.png

250 ms

arctic.png

arctic.png

294 ms

brandfx.png

brandfx.png

349 ms

buyers.png

buyers.png

349 ms

tommy_gate.png

tommy_gate.png

406 ms

rugby.png

rugby.png

308 ms

TraciHotz.png

TraciHotz.png

351 ms

Google__G__logo.png

Google__G__logo.png

352 ms

JayProffit.png

JayProffit.png

366 ms

CarolynStoddard.png

CarolynStoddard.png

407 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

35 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

39 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf

44 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rm.ttf

48 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWmb2Rm.ttf

48 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rm.ttf

50 ms

Accessibility Review

futureline.net accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

futureline.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

futureline.net SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futureline.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Futureline.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

futureline.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Future Line. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: