Tools & Wizards About Us
futurepregnancy.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

futurepregnancy.com

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

895 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

futurepregnancy.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to futurepregnancy.com homepage info - get ready to check Futurepregnancy best content right away, or after learning these important things about futurepregnancy.com

Visit futurepregnancy.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Futurepregnancy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 895 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

futurepregnancy.com performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

54/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.053

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

85/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

futurepregnancy.com

895 ms

domain_profile.cfm

475 ms

common.css

207 ms

v3.css

254 ms

pages_v3b.css

218 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Futurepregnancy.com, 78% (31 requests) were made to Static.hugedomains.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Hugedomains.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (895 ms) belongs to the original domain Futurepregnancy.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 170.8 kB (29%)

Content Size

582.5 kB

After Optimization

411.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Futurepregnancy.com main page is 582.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 326.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 13.7 kB

  • Original 19.5 kB
  • After minification 18.3 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.7 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 12.4 kB

  • Original 326.8 kB
  • After minification 314.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Futurepregnancy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 64.0 kB

  • Original 127.5 kB
  • After minification 127.5 kB
  • After compression 63.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.0 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 80.7 kB

  • Original 108.7 kB
  • After minification 107.1 kB
  • After compression 28.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Futurepregnancy.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 80.7 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (34%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Futurepregnancy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

futurepregnancy.com

futurepregnancy.com

895 ms

domain_profile.cfm

domain_profile.cfm

475 ms

common.css

common.css

207 ms

v3.css

v3.css

254 ms

pages_v3b.css

pages_v3b.css

218 ms

styles_hd.css

styles_hd.css

256 ms

common.js

common.js

221 ms

common_v3.js

common_v3.js

222 ms

jquery-1.5.1.min.js

jquery-1.5.1.min.js

239 ms

styles-new.css

styles-new.css

226 ms

ga.js

ga.js

158 ms

futurepregnancy.com_traffic.png

futurepregnancy.com_traffic.png

305 ms

bg.gif

bg.gif

64 ms

bg2.jpg

bg2.jpg

64 ms

logo_top.png

logo_top.png

62 ms

testp_monicaRodriguez.png

testp_monicaRodriguez.png

62 ms

testp_boomerBenefits.png

testp_boomerBenefits.png

62 ms

testp_talkchain.png

testp_talkchain.png

60 ms

stop_watch_78x92.jpg

stop_watch_78x92.jpg

116 ms

safe_94x116.jpg

safe_94x116.jpg

116 ms

graph_115x98.jpg

graph_115x98.jpg

115 ms

keys_76x116.png

keys_76x116.png

116 ms

zoom_102x98.png

zoom_102x98.png

115 ms

good.png

good.png

116 ms

footer_logo_cc.png

footer_logo_cc.png

121 ms

footer_logo_guaranteed.png

footer_logo_guaranteed.png

118 ms

footer_logo_escrow.png

footer_logo_escrow.png

117 ms

footer_logo_GT.png

footer_logo_GT.png

124 ms

chat-popup-close.png

chat-popup-close.png

114 ms

chat-popup-start.png

chat-popup-start.png

116 ms

mark_18x15_check_blue.png

mark_18x15_check_blue.png

71 ms

portrait_girl.png

portrait_girl.png

72 ms

banner-woman.png

banner-woman.png

73 ms

30-days-guarant.png

30-days-guarant.png

29 ms

counter.js

counter.js

63 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

29 ms

t.php

t.php

148 ms

stat.aspx

stat.aspx

61 ms

chat-popup.png

chat-popup.png

374 ms

bodyImage.cfm

bodyImage.cfm

149 ms

Accessibility Review

futurepregnancy.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

futurepregnancy.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

futurepregnancy.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futurepregnancy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Futurepregnancy.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

futurepregnancy.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Futurepregnancy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: