1.9 sec in total
149 ms
1.4 sec
382 ms
Visit futurevanlines.com now to see the best up-to-date Futurevanlines content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about futurevanlines.com
Make your relocation hassle free, secure and easier with us for different parts of Washington DC and Maryland.
Visit futurevanlines.comWe analyzed Futurevanlines.com page load time and found that the first response time was 149 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
futurevanlines.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value12.5 s
0/100
25%
Value7.1 s
31/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.638
9/100
15%
Value8.9 s
34/100
10%
149 ms
299 ms
26 ms
134 ms
273 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Futurevanlines.com, 14% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (638 ms) belongs to the original domain Futurevanlines.com.
Page size can be reduced by 678.4 kB (28%)
2.4 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Futurevanlines.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.5 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Futurevanlines images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 468.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 468.7 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 163.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Futurevanlines.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 163.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (55%)
49
22
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Futurevanlines. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
futurevanlines.com
149 ms
www.futurevanlines.com
299 ms
css
26 ms
reset.css
134 ms
style.css
273 ms
font-awesome.min.css
202 ms
responsive-leyouts.css
198 ms
color-switcher.css
145 ms
core.css
153 ms
fullwidth.css
199 ms
settings.css
218 ms
skin.css
224 ms
skin2.css
262 ms
accordion.css
258 ms
tabs.css
281 ms
fadeeffect.css
291 ms
formcheck.js
107 ms
jquery.js
578 ms
jquery-1.js
396 ms
styleselector.js
337 ms
ddsmoothmenu.js
347 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
498 ms
selectnav.js
347 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
445 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
438 ms
scripts.js
394 ms
tabs.js
430 ms
custom.js
430 ms
core.js
485 ms
modernizr.custom.75180.js
494 ms
analytics.js
23 ms
bodybg.jpg
467 ms
banner01.jpg
594 ms
banner02.jpg
578 ms
banner03.jpg
584 ms
banner04.jpg
521 ms
mov-img01.jpg
454 ms
mov-img02.jpg
487 ms
quote.png
527 ms
logo.png
559 ms
menu-divider.png
566 ms
menu-arrow.png
613 ms
para-bg1.jpg
634 ms
h-graph-line.png
614 ms
arrow-up.png
628 ms
pattern-03.jpg
638 ms
scroll-top-arrow.png
637 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
74 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
76 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
79 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
82 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
81 ms
collect
18 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
530 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxvqEJM-AK1nFUafhVdytxUY.ttf
8 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBl02b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf
7 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxmYImPRL1w80NlYTQ8LOqf4.ttf
9 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxiBnJMIPt0VoltfALX9gDFQ.ttf
7 ms
collect
57 ms
loader.gif
237 ms
timer.png
259 ms
large_left.png
97 ms
large_right.png
89 ms
futurevanlines.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
futurevanlines.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
futurevanlines.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futurevanlines.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Futurevanlines.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
futurevanlines.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Futurevanlines. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: