Tools & Wizards About Us
futurewave.design screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

futurewave.design

FUTUREWAVE — Product Design & Engineering Agency

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

16 ms

Resources Loaded

603 ms

Page Rendered

663 ms

futurewave.design screenshot

About Website

Visit futurewave.design now to see the best up-to-date FUTUREWAVE content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about futurewave.design

From idea to production, we focus the design and development of your products on innovation, aesthetics, interactions and performances.

Visit futurewave.design

Key Findings

We analyzed Futurewave.design page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

futurewave.design performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.7 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,340 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.1 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

futurewave.design

16 ms

futurewave.design

56 ms

gtm.js

77 ms

fbevents.js

41 ms

e57529b84719454c.css

109 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Futurewave.design, 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (390 ms) belongs to the original domain Futurewave.design.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 99.3 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Futurewave.design main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 55.1 kB

  • Original 70.1 kB
  • After minification 70.0 kB
  • After compression 14.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 37.0 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 964.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. FUTUREWAVE images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 52.2 kB
  • After minification 52.2 kB
  • After compression 45.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.2 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (70%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FUTUREWAVE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

futurewave.design

futurewave.design

16 ms

futurewave.design

futurewave.design

56 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

77 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

41 ms

e57529b84719454c.css

e57529b84719454c.css

109 ms

polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js

polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js

68 ms

webpack-f5d4f420a2e71953.js

webpack-f5d4f420a2e71953.js

107 ms

framework-fc97f3f1282ce3ed.js

framework-fc97f3f1282ce3ed.js

68 ms

main-866012bd041b4da5.js

main-866012bd041b4da5.js

154 ms

_app-17ed1884b9dd5b37.js

_app-17ed1884b9dd5b37.js

34 ms

fec483df-4260a1d4de0fe621.js

fec483df-4260a1d4de0fe621.js

179 ms

fb7d5399-258189d41c349e48.js

fb7d5399-258189d41c349e48.js

274 ms

368-5eb030f2ec6ac0da.js

368-5eb030f2ec6ac0da.js

280 ms

806-0f2f9eff791e3342.js

806-0f2f9eff791e3342.js

278 ms

661-8ede1f69d6da5e2e.js

661-8ede1f69d6da5e2e.js

281 ms

index-8c7568741e1d052d.js

index-8c7568741e1d052d.js

277 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

273 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

277 ms

_middlewareManifest.js

_middlewareManifest.js

283 ms

7574250.js

7574250.js

131 ms

675471470

675471470

141 ms

netlify-rum.js

netlify-rum.js

58 ms

Parasmart_hub_tilted%201.029393c2_3840_75.png

Parasmart_hub_tilted%201.029393c2_3840_75.png

350 ms

Frame%207.34b34417_3840_75.png

Frame%207.34b34417_3840_75.png

329 ms

Sans_titre_5_7583ea8f9e_3840_75.png

Sans_titre_5_7583ea8f9e_3840_75.png

346 ms

Frame_2_ecadc8a4d4_3840_75.png

Frame_2_ecadc8a4d4_3840_75.png

390 ms

parasmart_cover_ce78b2f511_3840_75.png

parasmart_cover_ce78b2f511_3840_75.png

363 ms

yoda_side_38489120d4_3840_75.jpg

yoda_side_38489120d4_3840_75.jpg

363 ms

js

js

80 ms

recorder.js

recorder.js

280 ms

7574250.js

7574250.js

143 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

148 ms

banner.js

banner.js

140 ms

84 ms

Aeonik-Medium.woff

Aeonik-Medium.woff

82 ms

Aeonik-Regular.woff

Aeonik-Regular.woff

118 ms

FavoritPro-Light.woff

FavoritPro-Light.woff

189 ms

FavoritPro-Book.woff

FavoritPro-Book.woff

189 ms

FavoritPro-Regular.woff

FavoritPro-Regular.woff

165 ms

29 ms

Accessibility Review

futurewave.design accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

futurewave.design best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

futurewave.design SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futurewave.design can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Futurewave.design main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

futurewave.design

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of FUTUREWAVE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: