2.4 sec in total
686 ms
1.6 sec
118 ms
Visit fwaf.com now to see the best up-to-date Fwaf content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fwaf.com
Visit fwaf.comWe analyzed Fwaf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 686 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
fwaf.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
68/100
10%
Value6.5 s
8/100
25%
Value4.1 s
78/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.191
64/100
15%
Value5.5 s
71/100
10%
686 ms
69 ms
103 ms
266 ms
106 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Fwaf.com, 59% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (686 ms) belongs to the original domain Fwaf.com.
Page size can be reduced by 456.3 kB (56%)
811.0 kB
354.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Fwaf.com main page is 811.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 375.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 111.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fwaf images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 269.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 269.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 72.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fwaf.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 72.3 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (21%)
14
11
The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fwaf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
fwaf.com
686 ms
jquery.min.js
69 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
103 ms
scripts.min.js
266 ms
common.js
106 ms
logo.png
119 ms
fortworth.jpg
118 ms
sand_castings_big.jpg
251 ms
folio_jewelry_industry.jpg
154 ms
folio_starter_system.jpg
154 ms
folio_conveying_industry.jpg
154 ms
folio_antenna_industry.jpg
155 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
27 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
33 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
31 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
32 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
33 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
34 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
33 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
35 ms
font
35 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
35 ms
modules.ttf
35 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exg.woff
6 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf
9 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWV4exg.woff
5 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWV4exQ.ttf
10 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWV4exg.woff
5 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWV4exQ.ttf
10 ms
font
13 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf
11 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWV4exg.woff
11 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWV4exQ.ttf
12 ms
style.min.css
68 ms
fwaf.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
fwaf.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
fwaf.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fwaf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fwaf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fwaf.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fwaf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: