Tools & Wizards About Us
fxcg.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

fxcg.com

Online Forex Trading on Forex,Gold,Oil and Indices|FXCG™

Page Load Speed

6.5 sec in total

First Response

475 ms

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

298 ms

fxcg.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing FXCG content for Vietnam. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fxcg.com

Trade currencies,commodities,futures and indices with ultra-low cost,lightning-fast execution and security of funds at FXCG

Visit fxcg.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fxcg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 475 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fxcg.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.6 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value860 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.8 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fxcg.com

475 ms

www.fxcg.com

1678 ms

top.css

382 ms

style.css

573 ms

style.min.css

1157 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Fxcg.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Cdn.livechatinc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Fxcg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 662.8 kB (35%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fxcg.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 91.2 kB

  • Original 108.2 kB
  • After minification 101.0 kB
  • After compression 17.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 134.7 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, FXCG needs image optimization as it can save up to 134.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 132.1 kB

  • Original 196.5 kB
  • After minification 194.2 kB
  • After compression 64.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 132.1 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 304.9 kB

  • Original 352.6 kB
  • After minification 276.3 kB
  • After compression 47.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fxcg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 304.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (46%)

Requests Now

82

After Optimization

44

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FXCG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fxcg.com

fxcg.com

475 ms

www.fxcg.com

www.fxcg.com

1678 ms

top.css

top.css

382 ms

style.css

style.css

573 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1157 ms

styles.css

styles.css

581 ms

style.css

style.css

582 ms

css.css

css.css

590 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

787 ms

slick.css

slick.css

762 ms

tablepress-custom.min.css

tablepress-custom.min.css

773 ms

kingcomposer.min.css

kingcomposer.min.css

1164 ms

animate.css

animate.css

981 ms

icons.css

icons.css

952 ms

wp-paginate.css

wp-paginate.css

966 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1179 ms

sidebar.css

sidebar.css

1144 ms

myChat.css

myChat.css

972 ms

whatsapp.css

whatsapp.css

991 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1148 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1160 ms

index.js

index.js

1165 ms

index.js

index.js

1171 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

1188 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

1188 ms

capstoneglobal.min.js

capstoneglobal.min.js

1339 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

1352 ms

jquery.webticker.min.js

jquery.webticker.min.js

1359 ms

kingcomposer.min.js

kingcomposer.min.js

1364 ms

js

js

69 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

992 ms

rel_account.png

rel_account.png

248 ms

mn_account.png

mn_account.png

249 ms

myks.png

myks.png

248 ms

online.png

online.png

249 ms

callback.png

callback.png

249 ms

menu.svg

menu.svg

250 ms

earth-1.png

earth-1.png

383 ms

new-logo.png

new-logo.png

391 ms

barclays-1.jpg

barclays-1.jpg

581 ms

HSBC.png

HSBC.png

391 ms

bonus-index.webp

bonus-index.webp

589 ms

news.jpg

news.jpg

396 ms

Bank-of-America-198x100.png

Bank-of-America-198x100.png

574 ms

Barclays-184x100.png

Barclays-184x100.png

581 ms

BNP-Paribas-195x100.png

BNP-Paribas-195x100.png

583 ms

Citadel-148x100.png

Citadel-148x100.png

589 ms

Citibank-81x100.png

Citibank-81x100.png

764 ms

Commerzbank-209x100.png

Commerzbank-209x100.png

775 ms

Credit-Suisse-202x100.png

Credit-Suisse-202x100.png

776 ms

Deutsche-Bank-62x100.png

Deutsche-Bank-62x100.png

780 ms

Goldman-Sachs-112x100.png

Goldman-Sachs-112x100.png

784 ms

JPMorgan-Chase.png

JPMorgan-Chase.png

787 ms

KCG-120x100.png

KCG-120x100.png

955 ms

Macquarie-208x100.png

Macquarie-208x100.png

963 ms

Morgan-Stanley-196x100.png

Morgan-Stanley-196x100.png

965 ms

Nomura-176x100.png

Nomura-176x100.png

970 ms

RBC-65x100.png

RBC-65x100.png

980 ms

RBS-119x100.png

RBS-119x100.png

984 ms

Societe-Generale-187x100.png

Societe-Generale-187x100.png

1145 ms

UBS-139x100.png

UBS-139x100.png

1155 ms

telegram.png

telegram.png

1157 ms

whatsapp.png

whatsapp.png

1163 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

1175 ms

whatsapp.svg

whatsapp.svg

1177 ms

telegram.svg

telegram.svg

1340 ms

tracking.js

tracking.js

82 ms

banner-bonus-backgroup-2220x353.jpg

banner-bonus-backgroup-2220x353.jpg

1488 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

105 ms

opensans-webfont.woff

opensans-webfont.woff

1108 ms

quotes.php

quotes.php

1441 ms

banner-ib-backgroup-2220x353.jpg

banner-ib-backgroup-2220x353.jpg

1697 ms

banner-blade-backgroup-2220x353.jpg

banner-blade-backgroup-2220x353.jpg

1519 ms

slide1bg-2125x353.jpg

slide1bg-2125x353.jpg

1323 ms

slide2bg-2220x353.jpg

slide2bg-2220x353.jpg

1465 ms

slide3bg-2220x353.jpg

slide3bg-2220x353.jpg

1356 ms

About-Us-Background.jpg

About-Us-Background.jpg

1378 ms

tick2.png

tick2.png

1488 ms

tick.png

tick.png

1520 ms

Open-Account-Background.jpg

Open-Account-Background.jpg

1358 ms

arrow-prev.png

arrow-prev.png

1382 ms

arrow-next.png

arrow-next.png

1386 ms

dot.png

dot.png

1493 ms

down.gif

down.gif

413 ms

up.gif

up.gif

432 ms

Accessibility Review

fxcg.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

fxcg.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

fxcg.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fxcg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fxcg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fxcg.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of FXCG. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: