3 sec in total
178 ms
2.6 sec
230 ms
Welcome to irt.figaf.com homepage info - get ready to check Irt Figaf best content right away, or after learning these important things about irt.figaf.com
Figaf DevOps Tool covers the needs for the entire development process. The only software that allows you to automate the delivery of your SAP PI/PO and CPI
Visit irt.figaf.comWe analyzed Irt.figaf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 178 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
irt.figaf.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value10.7 s
7/100
10%
Value3,370 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.089
92/100
15%
Value23.5 s
1/100
10%
178 ms
326 ms
330 ms
335 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Irt.figaf.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to Static.klaviyo.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (827 ms) relates to the external source Salesiq.zoho.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 134.9 kB (20%)
666.7 kB
531.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Irt.figaf.com main page is 666.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 354.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 120.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Irt Figaf images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Irt.figaf.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (96%)
67
3
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Irt Figaf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
178 ms
style.min.css
326 ms
embed-public.min.css
330 ms
astra-addon-65ca5a04649495-39073422.css
335 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
49 ms
frontend.min.css
38 ms
swiper.min.css
32 ms
post-668.css
46 ms
frontend.min.css
77 ms
uael-frontend.min.css
62 ms
all.min.css
458 ms
v4-shims.min.css
96 ms
she-header-style.css
99 ms
global.css
100 ms
post-8612.css
392 ms
post-213.css
112 ms
style.min.css
130 ms
font-awesome.min.css
145 ms
post-754.css
157 ms
hover-css.css
179 ms
ha-754.css
481 ms
fontawesome.min.css
717 ms
solid.min.css
338 ms
brands.min.css
636 ms
jquery.min.js
353 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
370 ms
v4-shims.min.js
679 ms
she-header.js
403 ms
ea397a0731045d544123dfa6f9ff03ca.js
488 ms
email-decode.min.js
404 ms
klaviyo.js
35 ms
style.min.js
759 ms
pdfobject.min.js
562 ms
embed-public.min.js
491 ms
astra-addon-65ca5a0464c6c6-49921409.js
503 ms
happy-addons.min.js
515 ms
happy-addons-pro.js
529 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
88 ms
kl-identify-browser.js
538 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
540 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
542 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
537 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
547 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
821 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
514 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
523 ms
hooks.min.js
535 ms
i18n.min.js
550 ms
frontend.min.js
542 ms
waypoints.min.js
547 ms
core.min.js
522 ms
frontend.min.js
526 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
507 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
446 ms
gtm.js
252 ms
figaf_logo.png
328 ms
widget
827 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58a-xw.ttf
51 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkM0o58a-xw.ttf
28 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkKEo58a-xw.ttf
117 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkCEv58a-xw.ttf
51 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkBgv58a-xw.ttf
179 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDOUhdTQ3ig.ttf
180 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDshdTQ3ig.ttf
179 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTQ3ig.ttf
183 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDIkhdTQ3ig.ttf
185 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDGUmdTQ3ig.ttf
181 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmdTQ3ig.ttf
181 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDsmdTQ3ig.ttf
183 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDBImdTQ3ig.ttf
182 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
635 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
718 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
537 ms
fender_analytics.739eafc699de20b4c3bb.js
57 ms
static.047f24ade89e4aff54a9.js
57 ms
runtime.242037525aa1c76dfe9b.js
2 ms
sharedUtils.a2ead10f1141521a8e3e.js
12 ms
vendors~signup_forms~post_identification_sync~web_personalization~reviews~atlas.3ee75b12730991c4d04b.js
12 ms
vendors~signup_forms~onsite-triggering.a2030eb5abe19f808c94.js
30 ms
vendors~signup_forms.e707d6d405eecdf67185.js
29 ms
default~signup_forms~onsite-triggering.ddf307d73959ae2a00ef.js
29 ms
signup_forms.5828d30d7aa945da8745.js
30 ms
js
26 ms
klaviyo.js
6 ms
88432af82cf6491d9737918e7c9a0489.js
33 ms
irt.figaf.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
irt.figaf.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
irt.figaf.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Irt.figaf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Irt.figaf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
irt.figaf.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Irt Figaf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: