2.1 sec in total
333 ms
1.5 sec
231 ms
Click here to check amazing Johnsteam Futurenet content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about johnsteam.futurenet.club
Welcome to the Futurenet Multimedia Club
Visit johnsteam.futurenet.clubWe analyzed Johnsteam.futurenet.club page load time and found that the first response time was 333 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
johnsteam.futurenet.club performance score
333 ms
89 ms
175 ms
5 ms
78 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Johnsteam.futurenet.club, 9% (4 requests) were made to Google.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (881 ms) belongs to the original domain Johnsteam.futurenet.club.
Page size can be reduced by 431.9 kB (21%)
2.1 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Johnsteam.futurenet.club main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.1 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 185.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Johnsteam Futurenet needs image optimization as it can save up to 185.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 179.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 179.9 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Johnsteam.futurenet.club needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.2 kB or 35% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (26%)
42
31
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Johnsteam Futurenet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
johnsteam.futurenet.club
333 ms
reset.css
89 ms
new_home_page.css
175 ms
jquery-ui.css
5 ms
jquery.min.js
78 ms
jquery-ui.js
34 ms
api.js
54 ms
recaptcha__en.js
73 ms
analytics.js
32 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
11 ms
woman.png
881 ms
logo.png
94 ms
01_.png
192 ms
arr_bottom.png
193 ms
02_.png
192 ms
05_.png
192 ms
03_.png
230 ms
04_.png
271 ms
06_.png
270 ms
07_.png
358 ms
08_.png
357 ms
09_.png
370 ms
10_.png
442 ms
11_.png
447 ms
12_.png
443 ms
13_.png
445 ms
14_.png
460 ms
15_.png
529 ms
16_.png
530 ms
17_.png
534 ms
18_.png
534 ms
input_background.png
550 ms
zaloguj.png
619 ms
registration.png
620 ms
Checkbox.png
621 ms
collect
25 ms
anchor
24 ms
styles__ltr.css
19 ms
-FHGegChvKELgmHNPF97Aj33qC9PBXl7UyexHItfpAU.js
16 ms
webworker.js
62 ms
logo_48.png
22 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
64 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
65 ms
recaptcha__en.js
16 ms
new_home_page_mobile.css
89 ms
johnsteam.futurenet.club SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Johnsteam.futurenet.club can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Johnsteam.futurenet.club main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
johnsteam.futurenet.club
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Johnsteam Futurenet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: