Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

124 ms

Resources Loaded

921 ms

Page Rendered

174 ms

nominate.futuredocs.com screenshot

About Website

Visit nominate.futuredocs.com now to see the best up-to-date Nominate Futuredocs content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nominate.futuredocs.com

Visit nominate.futuredocs.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nominate.futuredocs.com page load time and found that the first response time was 124 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nominate.futuredocs.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

nominate.futuredocs.com

124 ms

stub.js

15 ms

3_3_3.Finalorg.ajax4jsf.javascript.AjaxScript

53 ms

eAEz2rRkV-jyGdIAEoQD8g__

17 ms

functions.js

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Nominate.futuredocs.com, 26% (14 requests) were made to Futuredocs.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (218 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.googleapis.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (51%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Nominate.futuredocs.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 26.4 kB

  • Original 43.5 kB
  • After minification 43.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.4 kB or 61% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 249.3 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nominate Futuredocs needs image optimization as it can save up to 249.3 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 810.0 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 329.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 810.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 749.6 kB

  • Original 884.8 kB
  • After minification 881.7 kB
  • After compression 135.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nominate.futuredocs.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 749.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (66%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

17

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nominate Futuredocs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

nominate.futuredocs.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nominate.futuredocs.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nominate.futuredocs.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nominate Futuredocs. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: