1.2 sec in total
124 ms
921 ms
174 ms
Visit nominate.futuredocs.com now to see the best up-to-date Nominate Futuredocs content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nominate.futuredocs.com
Visit nominate.futuredocs.comWe analyzed Nominate.futuredocs.com page load time and found that the first response time was 124 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
nominate.futuredocs.com performance score
124 ms
15 ms
53 ms
17 ms
52 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Nominate.futuredocs.com, 26% (14 requests) were made to Futuredocs.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (218 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.googleapis.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (51%)
3.6 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Nominate.futuredocs.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.4 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 249.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nominate Futuredocs needs image optimization as it can save up to 249.3 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 810.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 810.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 749.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nominate.futuredocs.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 749.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (66%)
50
17
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nominate Futuredocs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nominate.futuredocs.com
124 ms
stub.js
15 ms
3_3_3.Finalorg.ajax4jsf.javascript.AjaxScript
53 ms
eAEz2rRkV-jyGdIAEoQD8g__
17 ms
functions.js
52 ms
main.js
76 ms
en_US.js
136 ms
desktopAjax.js
50 ms
picklist.js
50 ms
VFState.js
135 ms
zen-componentsCompatible.css
135 ms
elements.css
135 ms
common.css
133 ms
dStandard.css
191 ms
dCustom0.css
188 ms
extended.css
179 ms
setup.css
177 ms
style.css
179 ms
css
218 ms
trac.js
212 ms
jquery.min.js
131 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
205 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack-v1.7.js
211 ms
jquery-ui.css
204 ms
default.css
212 ms
ga.js
57 ms
fd-bg-top.png
57 ms
collins-murad.jpg
153 ms
lushniak-roberts.jpg
151 ms
barratt-chen.jpg
155 ms
Pomahac-slide.jpg
153 ms
Szostak-slide.jpg
152 ms
Souba-slide.jpg
154 ms
Mitchell-slide.jpg
167 ms
Venter-slide.jpg
164 ms
Jain-slide.jpg
156 ms
fd-header-logo.png
146 ms
s.gif
145 ms
__utm.gif
88 ms
loading.gif
81 ms
bgPageBlockRight.gif
69 ms
ui-bg_highlight-soft_100_eeeeee_1x100.png
60 ms
arrows.png
26 ms
bullets.png
27 ms
cal_sprite.png
190 ms
QctevGq8H0Q
75 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
23 ms
www-embed-player.js
45 ms
base.js
108 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
36 ms
ad_status.js
32 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
67 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
67 ms
nominate.futuredocs.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nominate.futuredocs.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nominate.futuredocs.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nominate.futuredocs.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nominate Futuredocs. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: