Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

239 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

225 ms

peter81.futurenet.club screenshot

About Website

Welcome to peter81.futurenet.club homepage info - get ready to check Peter 81 Futurenet best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about peter81.futurenet.club

Welcome to the Futurenet Multimedia Club

Visit peter81.futurenet.club

Key Findings

We analyzed Peter81.futurenet.club page load time and found that the first response time was 239 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

peter81.futurenet.club performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

peter81.futurenet.club

239 ms

reset.css

90 ms

new_home_page.css

176 ms

jquery-ui.css

46 ms

jquery.min.js

88 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Peter81.futurenet.club, 11% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (882 ms) belongs to the original domain Peter81.futurenet.club.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 385.0 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Peter81.futurenet.club main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 13.7 kB

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 14.1 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.1 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 185.4 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Peter 81 Futurenet needs image optimization as it can save up to 185.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 172.0 kB

  • Original 292.9 kB
  • After minification 292.9 kB
  • After compression 120.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 172.0 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 13.9 kB

  • Original 25.5 kB
  • After minification 23.1 kB
  • After compression 11.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Peter81.futurenet.club needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.9 kB or 55% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (21%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Peter 81 Futurenet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

peter81.futurenet.club SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Peter81.futurenet.club can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Peter81.futurenet.club main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Peter 81 Futurenet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: