3.5 sec in total
654 ms
2 sec
779 ms
Click here to check amazing Photo 2 Foodgawker content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about photo2.foodgawker.com
Come feed your eyes! Discover, search and share the best food blogger recipes.
Visit photo2.foodgawker.comWe analyzed Photo2.foodgawker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 654 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
photo2.foodgawker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value7.4 s
27/100
10%
Value990 ms
27/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.4 s
11/100
10%
654 ms
133 ms
140 ms
203 ms
201 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Photo2.foodgawker.com, 23% (15 requests) were made to Static.foodgawker.com and 17% (11 requests) were made to Photo.foodgawker.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (654 ms) belongs to the original domain Photo2.foodgawker.com.
Page size can be reduced by 737.1 kB (24%)
3.1 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Photo2.foodgawker.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Photo 2 Foodgawker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 470.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 470.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Photo2.foodgawker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 132.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (13%)
63
55
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Photo 2 Foodgawker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
photo2.foodgawker.com
654 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
133 ms
5c8b1642f3e1e4d51910832ef73311b6.73c8c306a4812e8a1a734c0027b7b62d.css
140 ms
537b609334dda0c2739d8713bcbf3ed6.a87daf404a998e14886216d065ac859f.js
203 ms
gpt.js
201 ms
gpt_mobile.js
362 ms
ga.js
363 ms
header-repeat_6-7-13.jpg
197 ms
2603342.jpg
351 ms
2603694.jpg
555 ms
2603710.jpg
533 ms
2603356.jpg
534 ms
2603352.jpg
548 ms
2603552.jpg
534 ms
2603366.jpg
533 ms
2603270.jpg
587 ms
2603372.jpg
588 ms
2603522.jpg
585 ms
2603614.jpg
560 ms
2603784.jpg
584 ms
retina-icons.png
328 ms
fg-logo_6-7-13.png
324 ms
sprite-a.20140610.png
325 ms
card-hover-top.png
378 ms
card-hover-btm.png
379 ms
2603798.jpg
379 ms
2603508.jpg
491 ms
2603554.jpg
530 ms
2603804.jpg
530 ms
2603306.jpg
529 ms
2603497.jpg
528 ms
2603452.jpg
529 ms
2603229.jpg
551 ms
2603454.jpg
616 ms
2603512.jpg
587 ms
footer-texture.jpg
216 ms
addthis-blank.gif
294 ms
Lato-Regular-webfont.woff
293 ms
Lato-Bold-webfont.woff
293 ms
pubads_impl_82.js
213 ms
footer-bar-texture.jpg
327 ms
quant.js
278 ms
loading-bar.gif
178 ms
__utm.gif
89 ms
__utm.gif
117 ms
container.html
110 ms
ads
428 ms
182 ms
pixel;r=1481691824;a=p-ac23cN1QUP2Is;fpan=1;fpa=P0-1556674739-1458489735888;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1458489735888;tzo=-180;ref=;url=https%3A%2F%2Fphoto2.foodgawker.com%2F;ogl=site_name.foodgawker%2Ctitle.foodgawker%2Ctype.blog%2Curl.https%3A%2F%2Ffoodgawker%252Ecom%2Cdescription.feed%20your%20eyes
77 ms
232833.jpg
331 ms
232843.jpg
280 ms
66603.jpg
328 ms
66625.jpg
291 ms
66609.jpg
330 ms
66621.jpg
329 ms
66613.jpg
333 ms
232841.jpg
314 ms
232845.jpg
315 ms
232847.jpg
317 ms
66601.jpg
259 ms
66619.jpg
313 ms
66607.jpg
316 ms
232821.jpg
317 ms
232835.jpg
315 ms
232829.jpg
328 ms
osd.js
48 ms
photo2.foodgawker.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
photo2.foodgawker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
photo2.foodgawker.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Photo2.foodgawker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Photo2.foodgawker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
photo2.foodgawker.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Photo 2 Foodgawker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: