Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

rostov.flamp.ru

Фламп — лучшие компании Ростова-на-Дону по отзывам клиентов. Рестораны, салоны красоты, медцентры и другие

Page Load Speed

18.1 sec in total

First Response

2.2 sec

Resources Loaded

15.7 sec

Page Rendered

248 ms

rostov.flamp.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rostov.flamp.ru homepage info - get ready to check Rostov Flamp best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about rostov.flamp.ru

На Флампе вы можете прочитать отзывы и выбрать лучший ресторан, лучшую стоматологию, лучшую парикмахерскую или любую другую компанию в Ростове-на-Дону.

Visit rostov.flamp.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Rostov.flamp.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 15.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rostov.flamp.ru performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

49/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value990 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.5 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rostov.flamp.ru

2159 ms

fonts.css

1187 ms

c_css_styles08f43b6a5a9a96cf9aa341df4bc76ec3.css

1204 ms

c_js_scriptsedca2ded7136790c03266c6371abf395.js

1929 ms

1.0

428 ms

Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Rostov.flamp.ru, 48% (53 requests) were made to Static.flamp.ru and 10% (11 requests) were made to Vk.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.3 sec) relates to the external source Maps.api.2gis.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 706.0 kB (49%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

726.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Rostov.flamp.ru main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 541.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 52.5 kB

  • Original 64.9 kB
  • After minification 58.0 kB
  • After compression 12.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.9 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 48.8 kB

  • Original 541.6 kB
  • After minification 492.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rostov Flamp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 214.7 kB

  • Original 305.2 kB
  • After minification 245.7 kB
  • After compression 90.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 214.7 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 390.0 kB

  • Original 521.1 kB
  • After minification 451.3 kB
  • After compression 131.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rostov.flamp.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 390.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (36%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

59

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rostov Flamp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rostov.flamp.ru accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

The document uses <meta http-equiv="refresh">

Best Practices

rostov.flamp.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rostov.flamp.ru SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rostov.flamp.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rostov.flamp.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rostov Flamp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: