4 sec in total
574 ms
3 sec
480 ms
Visit classic.gnu-darwin.org now to see the best up-to-date Classic GNU Darwin content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about classic.gnu-darwin.org
A collection of Darwin X11 BSD software: Geek Technology
Visit classic.gnu-darwin.orgWe analyzed Classic.gnu-darwin.org page load time and found that the first response time was 574 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
classic.gnu-darwin.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.4 s
98/100
10%
Value3.5 s
65/100
25%
Value5.1 s
61/100
10%
Value1,020 ms
26/100
30%
Value0.279
43/100
15%
Value10.1 s
26/100
10%
574 ms
139 ms
690 ms
186 ms
125 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Classic.gnu-darwin.org, 32% (27 requests) were made to S2.googleusercontent.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Classic.gnu-darwin.org.
Page size can be reduced by 305.2 kB (41%)
742.6 kB
437.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Classic.gnu-darwin.org main page is 742.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 358.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.4 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Classic GNU Darwin images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 221.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 221.3 kB or 62% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (55%)
80
36
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Classic GNU Darwin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
classic.gnu-darwin.org
574 ms
sflogo.php
139 ms
banner1.html
690 ms
addthis_widget.js
186 ms
toplogo-mid.png
125 ms
LogoSolidVert125Red.gif
125 ms
new4p2-gd-sm.png
684 ms
24752.qrcode.png
1951 ms
my-little-beyondbp.jpg
1187 ms
office-ppc-logo.png
1433 ms
mb-gd.png
2395 ms
twitter.png
117 ms
blogger.png
150 ms
digg.png
1181 ms
linkedin.png
302 ms
livejournal.png
388 ms
myspace.png
443 ms
reddit.png
650 ms
stumbleupon.png
651 ms
tumblr.png
652 ms
widget.js
112 ms
technorati.png
780 ms
wordpress.png
628 ms
rss.png
726 ms
rss2.png
792 ms
rss3.png
1055 ms
qr-code-qr-code.png
1057 ms
distro-1.1-gnome_thumb.png
1970 ms
Logo_25wht.gif
63 ms
show_ads.js
59 ms
favicons
218 ms
favicons
224 ms
favicons
225 ms
favicons
221 ms
favicons
214 ms
favicons
217 ms
favicons
269 ms
favicons
226 ms
favicons
238 ms
favicons
223 ms
x86-cd-icon-sm.png
1073 ms
office-icon-sm.png
2412 ms
dist-icon-sm.png
1962 ms
packages-icon-sm.png
2230 ms
today2-sm.png
2066 ms
project-support.jpg
212 ms
favicons
219 ms
favicons
218 ms
favicons
221 ms
favicons
219 ms
favicons
223 ms
favicons
222 ms
favicons
224 ms
favicons
246 ms
favicons
245 ms
favicons
268 ms
favicons
265 ms
favicons
283 ms
ref=cm_datasyn_favs_get_s_bmvo_t
205 ms
esp-button.png
535 ms
favicons
294 ms
favicons
291 ms
favicons
295 ms
favicons
326 ms
favicons
330 ms
getButton.png
1295 ms
zrt_lookup.html
97 ms
show_ads_impl.js
102 ms
ads
345 ms
osd.js
192 ms
300lo.json
188 ms
searchsquare2008.jpg
196 ms
clearpixel.gif
379 ms
sh.953eb77977227bfd253ee158.html
95 ms
css
338 ms
m_js_controller.js
474 ms
abg.js
515 ms
www.stopillegalspying.org
672 ms
favicon
94 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
84 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
77 ms
4A-myfZX6oDr9CtSTkTGig.ttf
88 ms
x_button_blue2.png
46 ms
s
26 ms
9aKOW9kHIBrJTB9ONj-e1oyTZuOGlgCE-J5p-KupNmo.js
6 ms
classic.gnu-darwin.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
classic.gnu-darwin.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
classic.gnu-darwin.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Classic.gnu-darwin.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Classic.gnu-darwin.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
classic.gnu-darwin.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Classic GNU Darwin. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: