Tools & Wizards About Us
en.gsmchoice.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

en.gsmchoice.com

GSMchoice.com :: The biggest mobile phones catalogue

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

238 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

613 ms

en.gsmchoice.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to en.gsmchoice.com homepage info - get ready to check En GSMchoice best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about en.gsmchoice.com

gsmchoice.com - The biggest mobile phones catalogue. Technical data, information, comparisons, review, users reviews.

Visit en.gsmchoice.com

Key Findings

We analyzed En.gsmchoice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 238 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

en.gsmchoice.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

55/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

65/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

en.gsmchoice.com

238 ms

en.gsmchoice.com

321 ms

477 ms

app.min.css

230 ms

adsbygoogle.js

398 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original En.gsmchoice.com, 74% (26 requests) were made to Files.gsmchoice.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Gsmchoice.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (666 ms) relates to the external source Files.gsmchoice.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 66.2 kB (26%)

Content Size

253.9 kB

After Optimization

187.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of En.gsmchoice.com main page is 253.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 83.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 65.8 kB

  • Original 78.9 kB
  • After minification 67.5 kB
  • After compression 13.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.3 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 141 B

  • Original 56.4 kB
  • After minification 56.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. En GSMchoice images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 139 B

  • Original 83.6 kB
  • After minification 83.6 kB
  • After compression 83.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 170 B

  • Original 35.1 kB
  • After minification 35.1 kB
  • After compression 34.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. En.gsmchoice.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (9%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of En GSMchoice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

en.gsmchoice.com

en.gsmchoice.com

238 ms

en.gsmchoice.com

en.gsmchoice.com

321 ms

477 ms

app.min.css

app.min.css

230 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

398 ms

main_page.min.js

main_page.min.js

224 ms

quant.js

quant.js

80 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

132 ms

gsmchoice3.png

gsmchoice3.png

374 ms

mgsm_search_mobile.svg

mgsm_search_mobile.svg

377 ms

mgsm_menu_mobile.svg

mgsm_menu_mobile.svg

386 ms

samsung_galaxy-a35-5g-small.jpg

samsung_galaxy-a35-5g-small.jpg

407 ms

samsung-galaxy-a25-small.jpg

samsung-galaxy-a25-small.jpg

407 ms

vox_v93-small.jpg

vox_v93-small.jpg

409 ms

vox_kick-k8-small.jpg

vox_kick-k8-small.jpg

429 ms

vox_v5600-small.jpg

vox_v5600-small.jpg

450 ms

maxcom_classic-mm718l-small.jpg

maxcom_classic-mm718l-small.jpg

458 ms

maxcom_comfort-mm39d-small.jpg

maxcom_comfort-mm39d-small.jpg

483 ms

maxcom_mm248-4g-small.jpg

maxcom_mm248-4g-small.jpg

484 ms

vivo_y28e-5g-small.jpg

vivo_y28e-5g-small.jpg

487 ms

samsung_galaxy-watch7-44mm-small.jpg

samsung_galaxy-watch7-44mm-small.jpg

500 ms

samsung_galaxy-watch7-40mm-small.jpg

samsung_galaxy-watch7-40mm-small.jpg

522 ms

lava_blaze-x-small.jpg

lava_blaze-x-small.jpg

532 ms

samsung_galaxy-watch-ultra-small.jpg

samsung_galaxy-watch-ultra-small.jpg

559 ms

samsung_galaxy-z-fold6-small.jpg

samsung_galaxy-z-fold6-small.jpg

561 ms

samsung_galaxy-z-flip6-small.jpg

samsung_galaxy-z-flip6-small.jpg

566 ms

redmi_13-5g-small.jpg

redmi_13-5g-small.jpg

572 ms

vivo_y58-small.jpg

vivo_y58-small.jpg

594 ms

honor_magic-v3-small.jpg

honor_magic-v3-small.jpg

605 ms

honor_magic-vs3-small.jpg

honor_magic-vs3-small.jpg

636 ms

honor_play-8t-pro-small.jpg

honor_play-8t-pro-small.jpg

638 ms

nubia_red-magic-9s-proplus-small.jpg

nubia_red-magic-9s-proplus-small.jpg

644 ms

facebook_icon.svg

facebook_icon.svg

643 ms

youtube_icon.svg

youtube_icon.svg

666 ms

arrow-circle.png

arrow-circle.png

126 ms

Accessibility Review

en.gsmchoice.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

en.gsmchoice.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

en.gsmchoice.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise En.gsmchoice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that En.gsmchoice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

en.gsmchoice.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of En GSMchoice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: