13.3 sec in total
2.8 sec
10.4 sec
134 ms
Visit gadgetsee.com now to see the best up-to-date Gadgetsee content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gadgetsee.com
Let's enjoy eCommerce!
Visit gadgetsee.comWe analyzed Gadgetsee.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.8 sec and then it took 10.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
gadgetsee.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value3.7 s
57/100
25%
Value3.2 s
91/100
10%
Value200 ms
90/100
30%
Value0.053
98/100
15%
Value3.9 s
89/100
10%
2780 ms
684 ms
608 ms
703 ms
457 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Gadgetsee.com, 19% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.2 sec) relates to the external source Huistore.org.
Page size can be reduced by 290.5 kB (72%)
403.1 kB
112.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Gadgetsee.com main page is 403.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 193.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gadgetsee images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 127.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 127.8 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 144.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gadgetsee.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 144.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (69%)
39
12
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gadgetsee. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gadgetsee.com
2780 ms
global.css
684 ms
gadgetsee.com
608 ms
jquery.js
703 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
457 ms
frontend.js
479 ms
modernizr-2.0.6.min.js
482 ms
css
40 ms
styles,_default.css+functions,_css,_shortcodes.css+custom.css.pagespeed.cc.dh3l03kCZo.css
675 ms
widgets.js
13 ms
thickbox.js
700 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
702 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
821 ms
woocommerce.min.js
889 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
894 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
914 ms
plugins.js
920 ms
script.js
922 ms
plusone.js
64 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
812 ms
layout.css
880 ms
animation.css
219 ms
logo.png
6232 ms
html.png
237 ms
argentum.png
237 ms
search.png
237 ms
K6ngFdK5haaaRGBV8waDwA.ttf
15 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
54 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
52 ms
fastbutton
113 ms
admin-ajax.php
614 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
107 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
226 ms
postmessageRelay
110 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
39 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
49 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
67 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
29 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
28 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
33 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
5 ms
jot
83 ms
gadgetsee.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
gadgetsee.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
gadgetsee.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gadgetsee.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Gadgetsee.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gadgetsee.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gadgetsee. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: