3.7 sec in total
352 ms
1.5 sec
1.9 sec
Click here to check amazing Gadget Sick content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gadgetsick.com
Gadget sick offers services such as computer repair, software and OS installation, TV mounting, smart home installations, virus & spyware removal and more
Visit gadgetsick.comWe analyzed Gadgetsick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 352 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
gadgetsick.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
55/100
10%
Value6.4 s
9/100
25%
Value5.1 s
61/100
10%
Value140 ms
95/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value6.4 s
60/100
10%
352 ms
75 ms
74 ms
56 ms
89 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Gadgetsick.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (405 ms) relates to the external source Ws-na.amazon-adsystem.com.
Page size can be reduced by 802.0 kB (51%)
1.6 MB
780.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Gadgetsick.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 634.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 119.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gadget Sick images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 125.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 125.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 530.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gadgetsick.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 530.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (77%)
35
8
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gadget Sick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gadgetsick.com
352 ms
hqljl.css
75 ms
css
74 ms
hqljl.css
56 ms
hqljl.css
89 ms
post-4.css
54 ms
hqljl.css
68 ms
css
36 ms
css
120 ms
jquery.js
33 ms
icf7s_configure.js
51 ms
elementor.js
38 ms
scripts.js
53 ms
scripts.js
53 ms
main.js
105 ms
core.min.js
105 ms
position.min.js
104 ms
site.js
403 ms
wp-embed.js
394 ms
frontend-modules.js
403 ms
jquery.sticky.js
393 ms
frontend.js
404 ms
dialog.js
402 ms
waypoints.js
403 ms
swiper.js
404 ms
share-link.js
403 ms
frontend.js
402 ms
q
405 ms
analytics.js
278 ms
g-logo.png
127 ms
0002.jpg
220 ms
5-star.jpg
128 ms
hp-help-and-support.jpg
127 ms
Untitled-1.png
163 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
58 ms
collect
57 ms
getad
300 ms
frontend-msie.min.css
200 ms
gadgetsick.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
gadgetsick.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
gadgetsick.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gadgetsick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gadgetsick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gadgetsick.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gadget Sick. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: