Tools & Wizards About Us
galaxyprocess.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

galaxyprocess.in

Fluid Mixing Equipment Manufacturer: Galaxy Industrial Equipment.

Page Load Speed

7.6 sec in total

First Response

975 ms

Resources Loaded

6.3 sec

Page Rendered

399 ms

galaxyprocess.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Galaxy Process content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about galaxyprocess.in

Galaxy Industrial Equipment is a top manufacturer of fluid mixing equipment. focused on creating and manufacturing premium mixing equipment for a range of industries.

Visit galaxyprocess.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Galaxyprocess.in page load time and found that the first response time was 975 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

galaxyprocess.in performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,000 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.188

65/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.2 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

galaxyprocess.in

975 ms

www.galaxyprocess.in

1421 ms

gtm.js

63 ms

style.css

796 ms

responsive.css

784 ms

Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Galaxyprocess.in, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Galaxyprocess.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (31%)

Content Size

5.2 MB

After Optimization

3.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Galaxyprocess.in main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 54.2 kB

  • Original 61.7 kB
  • After minification 49.8 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.8 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.2 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Galaxy Process images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 703.3 kB

  • Original 930.6 kB
  • After minification 744.6 kB
  • After compression 227.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 703.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 818.1 kB

  • Original 918.6 kB
  • After minification 761.3 kB
  • After compression 100.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Galaxyprocess.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 818.1 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (72%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Galaxy Process. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

galaxyprocess.in

galaxyprocess.in

975 ms

www.galaxyprocess.in

www.galaxyprocess.in

1421 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

63 ms

style.css

style.css

796 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

784 ms

js

js

96 ms

js

js

44 ms

jquery-latest.js

jquery-latest.js

1228 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

601 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

808 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

819 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

981 ms

jquery.mixitup.min.js

jquery.mixitup.min.js

1003 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

802 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

1005 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

1010 ms

isotope.js

isotope.js

1232 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

1180 ms

jquery.bootstrap-touchspin.js

jquery.bootstrap-touchspin.js

1205 ms

bootstrap-select.js

bootstrap-select.js

1219 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

1427 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

1383 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

1408 ms

revolution.extension.carousel.min.js

revolution.extension.carousel.min.js

1420 ms

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

1427 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

1439 ms

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

1579 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

1610 ms

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

1622 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

1633 ms

revolution.extension.video.min.js

revolution.extension.video.min.js

1633 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1646 ms

css

css

28 ms

css

css

41 ms

imp.css

imp.css

1192 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1416 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1230 ms

hover.css

hover.css

1249 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

1237 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

1256 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

1387 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

1436 ms

jquery.bootstrap-touchspin.css

jquery.bootstrap-touchspin.css

1440 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

1453 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

1462 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

1579 ms

nouislider.css

nouislider.css

1419 ms

nouislider.pips.css

nouislider.pips.css

1433 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

1426 ms

timePicker.css

timePicker.css

1280 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

1274 ms

settings.css

settings.css

1382 ms

layers.css

layers.css

1421 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

1263 ms

bootstrap-select.css

bootstrap-select.css

1244 ms

polyglot-language-switcher.css

polyglot-language-switcher.css

1243 ms

spinners.css

spinners.css

1466 ms

pulse.css

pulse.css

1353 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

126 ms

js

js

123 ms

logo.png

logo.png

308 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

502 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

688 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

901 ms

latest-blog-1.jpg

latest-blog-1.jpg

307 ms

latest-blog-2.jpg

latest-blog-2.jpg

308 ms

latest-blog-3.jpg

latest-blog-3.jpg

508 ms

slogan-bg.jpg

slogan-bg.jpg

514 ms

who-we-are.jpg

who-we-are.jpg

508 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

705 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

706 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

709 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

724 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

881 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

908 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

909 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

919 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

137 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

829 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

977 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7j.woff

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7j.woff

168 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdo.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdo.woff

169 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wlxdo.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wlxdo.woff

195 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdo.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdo.woff

204 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdo.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdo.woff

205 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdo.woff

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdo.woff

220 ms

fontawesome-webfont3295.woff

fontawesome-webfont3295.woff

1000 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

920 ms

submenu-icon.png

submenu-icon.png

919 ms

revicons90c6.woff

revicons90c6.woff

918 ms

collect

collect

84 ms

js

js

56 ms

Accessibility Review

galaxyprocess.in accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

galaxyprocess.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

galaxyprocess.in SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Galaxyprocess.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Galaxyprocess.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

galaxyprocess.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Galaxy Process. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: