Tools & Wizards About Us
galyam-studio.co.il screenshot

Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

galyam-studio.co.il

קידום אתרים בגוגל תוצאות אורגניות 100% שירות מכל ה❤️ GalyamStudio

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

66 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

2.4 sec

galyam-studio.co.il screenshot

About Website

Welcome to galyam-studio.co.il homepage info - get ready to check Galyam Studio best content for Israel right away, or after learning these important things about galyam-studio.co.il

קידום אתרים בגוגל SEO נעשה ע"י צוות GalyamStudio החברה המובילה בישראל 100% הצלחה, קידום בגוגל, בניית אתרים ועוד. מעל 15 שנות ניסיון

Visit galyam-studio.co.il

Key Findings

We analyzed Galyam-studio.co.il page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

galyam-studio.co.il performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

galyam-studio.co.il

66 ms

galyam-studio.co.il

579 ms

47d8be08b7e49d01fc8fdab584f5918e.css

50 ms

post-5.css

67 ms

post-561.css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Galyam-studio.co.il, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Galyam-studio.co.il.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 291.1 kB (18%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Galyam-studio.co.il main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 286.7 kB

  • Original 336.6 kB
  • After minification 322.3 kB
  • After compression 49.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 286.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Galyam Studio images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 11 B

  • Original 2.9 kB
  • After minification 2.9 kB
  • After compression 2.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 85.2 kB
  • After minification 85.2 kB
  • After compression 84.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Galyam-studio.co.il has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (18%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

37

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Galyam Studio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

galyam-studio.co.il

galyam-studio.co.il

66 ms

galyam-studio.co.il

galyam-studio.co.il

579 ms

47d8be08b7e49d01fc8fdab584f5918e.css

47d8be08b7e49d01fc8fdab584f5918e.css

50 ms

post-5.css

post-5.css

67 ms

post-561.css

post-561.css

38 ms

post-787.css

post-787.css

42 ms

post-819.css

post-819.css

40 ms

css

css

36 ms

Banner01-copy-scaled-1.webp

Banner01-copy-scaled-1.webp

16 ms

Slide02-3-scaled-1.webp

Slide02-3-scaled-1.webp

22 ms

%D7%A7%D7%99%D7%93%D7%95%D7%9D-%D7%90%D7%AA%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%91%D7%92%D7%95%D7%92%D7%9C.jpg

%D7%A7%D7%99%D7%93%D7%95%D7%9D-%D7%90%D7%AA%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%91%D7%92%D7%95%D7%92%D7%9C.jpg

75 ms

bg-section.jpeg

bg-section.jpeg

15 ms

circle.svg

circle.svg

295 ms

post-1051.css

post-1051.css

25 ms

post-21872.css

post-21872.css

13 ms

post-23639.css

post-23639.css

15 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

47 ms

duvshanitregularwebfont.woff

duvshanitregularwebfont.woff

409 ms

duvshanitlightwebfont.woff

duvshanitlightwebfont.woff

448 ms

duvshanitboldwebfont.woff

duvshanitboldwebfont.woff

387 ms

duvshanitblackwebfont.woff

duvshanitblackwebfont.woff

448 ms

new_logo.png

new_logo.png

301 ms

google_img.png

google_img.png

186 ms

google_img2.png

google_img2.png

200 ms

google_img3.png

google_img3.png

215 ms

ellipse-icon4.png

ellipse-icon4.png

504 ms

ellipse-icon.png

ellipse-icon.png

587 ms

ellipse-icon6.png

ellipse-icon6.png

626 ms

ellipse-icon3.png

ellipse-icon3.png

643 ms

ellipse-icon2.png

ellipse-icon2.png

653 ms

ellipse-icon5.png

ellipse-icon5.png

676 ms

pp1-1-2.png

pp1-1-2.png

1064 ms

pp1-4.png

pp1-4.png

1129 ms

pp1-3.png

pp1-3.png

1215 ms

pp1-2.png

pp1-2.png

1318 ms

customer_6.png

customer_6.png

960 ms

customer_5.png

customer_5.png

963 ms

customer_1.png

customer_1.png

1256 ms

customer_37.png

customer_37.png

1260 ms

customer_51.png

customer_51.png

1360 ms

customer_56.png

customer_56.png

1415 ms

customer_61.png

customer_61.png

1520 ms

56789.jpg

56789.jpg

1716 ms

%D7%A9%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%9E%D7%99.jpg

%D7%A9%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%9E%D7%99.jpg

1638 ms

Screenshot_13.jpg

Screenshot_13.jpg

1777 ms

Screenshot_12.jpg

Screenshot_12.jpg

1856 ms

Screenshot_11.jpg

Screenshot_11.jpg

1972 ms

Screenshot_9.jpg

Screenshot_9.jpg

1977 ms

Screenshot_14.jpg

Screenshot_14.jpg

2018 ms

logo-min.png

logo-min.png

1731 ms

logo_black.png

logo_black.png

2039 ms

Accessibility Review

galyam-studio.co.il accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

galyam-studio.co.il best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

galyam-studio.co.il SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    IW

  • Language Claimed

    HE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Galyam-studio.co.il can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Hebrew is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Galyam-studio.co.il main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

galyam-studio.co.il

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Galyam Studio. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: