Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

gapcentral.gbw.solutions

Sonata GBW | Mystery Shopping, Customer Experience service, Sonata Platformation

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

711 ms

Resources Loaded

721 ms

Page Rendered

50 ms

gapcentral.gbw.solutions screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gapcentral.gbw.solutions homepage info - get ready to check Gapcentral GBW best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about gapcentral.gbw.solutions

Sonata GBW provides companies with unique customer experience programs through a handy set of measuring and reporting tools

Visit gapcentral.gbw.solutions

Key Findings

We analyzed Gapcentral.gbw.solutions page load time and found that the first response time was 711 ms and then it took 771 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gapcentral.gbw.solutions performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value19.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value33.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value33.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value910 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.134

80/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value43.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gapcentral.gbw.solutions

711 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Gapcentral.gbw.solutions and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (711 ms) belongs to the original domain Gapcentral.gbw.solutions.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 344.5 kB (14%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Gapcentral.gbw.solutions main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 30 B

  • Original 157 B
  • After minification 157 B
  • After compression 127 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30 B or 19% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 189.1 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gapcentral GBW images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 132.3 kB

  • Original 350.6 kB
  • After minification 347.5 kB
  • After compression 218.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 132.3 kB or 38% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 23.1 kB

  • Original 77.3 kB
  • After minification 77.0 kB
  • After compression 54.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gapcentral.gbw.solutions needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 30% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

gapcentral.gbw.solutions accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

gapcentral.gbw.solutions best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gapcentral.gbw.solutions SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gapcentral.gbw.solutions can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gapcentral.gbw.solutions main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gapcentral GBW. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: