6.9 sec in total
196 ms
6.5 sec
241 ms
Click here to check amazing Ga Polo content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gapolo.com
Visit gapolo.comWe analyzed Gapolo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 196 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
gapolo.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.151
75/100
15%
Value4.3 s
85/100
10%
196 ms
5169 ms
158 ms
220 ms
219 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Gapolo.com, 14% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Gapolo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 160.8 kB (34%)
473.4 kB
312.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Gapolo.com main page is 473.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 153.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 339 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ga Polo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 50.5 kB or 38% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gapolo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 60.1 kB or 47% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (83%)
29
5
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ga Polo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gapolo.com
196 ms
gapolo.com
5169 ms
style.min.css
158 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
220 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
219 ms
utilities.css
224 ms
css
28 ms
css
44 ms
bootstrap.css
307 ms
font-awesome.min.css
242 ms
magnific-popup.css
240 ms
owl-carousel.css
292 ms
aos.css
315 ms
navigation-menu.css
304 ms
style.css
328 ms
utilities.js
320 ms
jquery.min.js
441 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
382 ms
css2
46 ms
dom-ready.min.js
323 ms
main.js
319 ms
bootstrap.js
493 ms
aos.js
347 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
487 ms
owl-carousel.js
500 ms
jquery.sticky.js
487 ms
bc-business-consulting.js
492 ms
e-202435.js
12 ms
cropped-ghswpa_logo_header.jpg
495 ms
custom-header.jpg
724 ms
048d7fa4aa31c04da9255b113c2910df
160 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
52 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
69 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
158 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf
89 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf
99 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHvxk.ttf
99 ms
gapolo.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
gapolo.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gapolo.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gapolo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gapolo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gapolo.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ga Polo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: