Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 50

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

gardenerstoolbag.com

彩天下app-彩天下【安全购彩】

Page Load Speed

8.2 sec in total

First Response

835 ms

Resources Loaded

6.9 sec

Page Rendered

386 ms

gardenerstoolbag.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Gardenerstoolbag content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gardenerstoolbag.com

彩天下app-彩天下【安全购彩】【安全稳定,提款秒出】小美提供www.gardenerstoolbag.com是高信誉的老品牌,拥有超凡的实力,业界口碑领先者值得信赖。为大家提供了一站式购彩服务,随时在线购彩...

Visit gardenerstoolbag.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gardenerstoolbag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 835 ms and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gardenerstoolbag.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

gardenerstoolbag.com

835 ms

script.js

249 ms

style.css

243 ms

shareaholic.js

8 ms

widget.css

276 ms

Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Gardenerstoolbag.com, 8% (8 requests) were made to Dsum-sec.casalemedia.com and 7% (7 requests) were made to Px.owneriq.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) relates to the external source Ssum-sec.casalemedia.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (65%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

572.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Gardenerstoolbag.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 975.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 215.4 kB

  • Original 238.8 kB
  • After minification 233.3 kB
  • After compression 23.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 215.4 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 31.7 kB

  • Original 319.9 kB
  • After minification 288.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gardenerstoolbag images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 729.4 kB

  • Original 975.7 kB
  • After minification 971.2 kB
  • After compression 246.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 729.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 78.6 kB

  • Original 93.6 kB
  • After minification 83.5 kB
  • After compression 15.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gardenerstoolbag.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (65%)

Requests Now

86

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gardenerstoolbag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

gardenerstoolbag.com accessibility score

50

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gardenerstoolbag.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gardenerstoolbag.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gardenerstoolbag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Gardenerstoolbag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gardenerstoolbag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: