Tools & Wizards About Us
gardenview.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

gardenview.org

Garden View | Assisted Living | Independent Living | Retirement Living

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

174 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

364 ms

gardenview.org screenshot

About Website

Visit gardenview.org now to see the best up-to-date Garden View content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gardenview.org

Garden View provides tailored retirement living options, including assisted living, luxury apartments, and memory care. Learn more here.

Visit gardenview.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Gardenview.org page load time and found that the first response time was 174 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gardenview.org performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

52/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gardenview.org

174 ms

gardenview.org

1480 ms

assets.min.css

235 ms

css

34 ms

css

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Gardenview.org, 59% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Gardenview.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 55.9 kB (24%)

Content Size

230.3 kB

After Optimization

174.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Gardenview.org main page is 230.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 167.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 55.9 kB

  • Original 63.3 kB
  • After minification 51.9 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.4 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.9 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 167.0 kB
  • After minification 167.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Garden View images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (38%)

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Garden View. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gardenview.org

gardenview.org

174 ms

gardenview.org

gardenview.org

1480 ms

assets.min.css

assets.min.css

235 ms

css

css

34 ms

css

css

53 ms

styles.css

styles.css

335 ms

website.assets.min.js

website.assets.min.js

497 ms

website.min.js

website.min.js

365 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

248 ms

banner-front-of-building-2.jpeg

banner-front-of-building-2.jpeg

290 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

213 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

21 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf

31 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

41 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

47 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

48 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxP.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxP.ttf

64 ms

yYLl0h7Wyfzjyw.ttf

yYLl0h7Wyfzjyw.ttf

48 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISWaA.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISWaA.ttf

49 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjovoSWaA.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjovoSWaA.ttf

48 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSWaA.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSWaA.ttf

65 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDISWaA.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDISWaA.ttf

65 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWWaA.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWWaA.ttf

66 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoUoOWaA.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoUoOWaA.ttf

67 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4OWaA.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4OWaA.ttf

66 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDIOWaA.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDIOWaA.ttf

67 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoJYOWaA.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoJYOWaA.ttf

65 ms

Accessibility Review

gardenview.org accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

gardenview.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

gardenview.org SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gardenview.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gardenview.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gardenview.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Garden View. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: