Tools & Wizards About Us
gardepot.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

gardepot.com

China Garden Tools, Garden Tools Manufacturer - Gardepot

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

531 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

589 ms

gardepot.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gardepot.com homepage info - get ready to check Gardepot best content right away, or after learning these important things about gardepot.com

Gardepot is a garden tools manufacturer in China, offering a vast array of gardening tools including watering and irrigation, pruners and shears, garden power tools, plant supports, garden fences, out...

Visit gardepot.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gardepot.com page load time and found that the first response time was 531 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gardepot.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gardepot.com

531 ms

gtm.js

66 ms

cookie-consent.js

96 ms

main.css

505 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

429 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Gardepot.com, 12% (7 requests) were made to Kht.zoosnet.net and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Kht.zoosnet.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 693.8 kB (27%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gardepot.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 151.1 kB

  • Original 173.0 kB
  • After minification 114.0 kB
  • After compression 21.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 58.9 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 151.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 270.7 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gardepot needs image optimization as it can save up to 270.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 186.2 kB

  • Original 328.5 kB
  • After minification 328.0 kB
  • After compression 142.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 186.2 kB or 57% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 85.7 kB

  • Original 112.5 kB
  • After minification 92.8 kB
  • After compression 26.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gardepot.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 85.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (22%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

35

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gardepot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gardepot.com

gardepot.com

531 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

66 ms

cookie-consent.js

cookie-consent.js

96 ms

main.css

main.css

505 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

429 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

498 ms

main.js

main.js

308 ms

base.js

base.js

204 ms

lang.js

lang.js

205 ms

form1.js

form1.js

235 ms

LsJS.aspx

LsJS.aspx

1221 ms

logo.png

logo.png

88 ms

lang1.png

lang1.png

89 ms

666b955aba8ac1920_.jpg

666b955aba8ac1920_.jpg

138 ms

666b9565ca7801920_.jpg

666b9565ca7801920_.jpg

204 ms

666b9570e68d41920_.jpg

666b9570e68d41920_.jpg

260 ms

66611642f38ea1920_.jpg

66611642f38ea1920_.jpg

338 ms

666b957ae79f71920_.jpg

666b957ae79f71920_.jpg

328 ms

66680047c403a_.jpg

66680047c403a_.jpg

133 ms

66bad5c3c2f1a_.jpg

66bad5c3c2f1a_.jpg

199 ms

666800990c941_.jpg

666800990c941_.jpg

206 ms

669f6c403ef0b_.jpg

669f6c403ef0b_.jpg

266 ms

669f6d54a2197_.jpg

669f6d54a2197_.jpg

272 ms

669f6d43b3f25_.jpg

669f6d43b3f25_.jpg

275 ms

669f6cd528408_.jpg

669f6cd528408_.jpg

325 ms

66680440ee4b5_.png

66680440ee4b5_.png

533 ms

666804563c9ce_.jpg

666804563c9ce_.jpg

342 ms

index.php

index.php

366 ms

reanod.png

reanod.png

391 ms

669759d632742.png

669759d632742.png

393 ms

6668022478653.jpg

6668022478653.jpg

404 ms

lang1.png

lang1.png

381 ms

hpro-bg1.jpg

hpro-bg1.jpg

398 ms

hcstm-bg1.jpg

hcstm-bg1.jpg

420 ms

hpro-bg2.jpg

hpro-bg2.jpg

424 ms

DDINPRO400Regular.woff

DDINPRO400Regular.woff

464 ms

DDINPRO400Regular.woff

DDINPRO400Regular.woff

442 ms

iconfont.woff

iconfont.woff

530 ms

DDINPRO600SemiBold.woff

DDINPRO600SemiBold.woff

515 ms

DDINPRO600SemiBold.woff

DDINPRO600SemiBold.woff

488 ms

ftbg1.png

ftbg1.png

608 ms

facebook.svg

facebook.svg

503 ms

instagram.svg

instagram.svg

505 ms

linkedin.svg

linkedin.svg

512 ms

pinterest.svg

pinterest.svg

532 ms

star1.png

star1.png

545 ms

DDINPRO500Medium.woff

DDINPRO500Medium.woff

558 ms

DDINPRO500Medium.woff

DDINPRO500Medium.woff

570 ms

DDINPRO400Regular.ttf

DDINPRO400Regular.ttf

192 ms

DDINPRO600SemiBold.ttf

DDINPRO600SemiBold.ttf

164 ms

DDINPRO500Medium.ttf

DDINPRO500Medium.ttf

67 ms

DDINPRO400Regular.svg

DDINPRO400Regular.svg

69 ms

DDINPRO600SemiBold.svg

DDINPRO600SemiBold.svg

69 ms

DDINPRO500Medium.svg

DDINPRO500Medium.svg

66 ms

JS5_2.css

JS5_2.css

197 ms

JS_Float.aspx

JS_Float.aspx

397 ms

2.gif

2.gif

578 ms

mobileofflineimgsrc_en.png

mobileofflineimgsrc_en.png

478 ms

7.gif

7.gif

1152 ms

newsid0.aspx

newsid0.aspx

384 ms

Accessibility Review

gardepot.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gardepot.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

gardepot.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gardepot.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gardepot.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gardepot.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gardepot. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: